Thanks all! Super helpful.
Ben
On Wed, Feb 6, 2019 at 11:55 AM Ben Asher wrote:
> Hi there! We're having a debate at my company about date storage in
> SQLite. SQLite has builtin support for ISO8601 in its date functions, so
> some folks have started storing dates as ISO8601 SQLite-compatible
On Wednesday, 6 February, 2019 12:55, Ben Asher wrote:
> Hi there! We're having a debate at my company about date storage in
> SQLite. SQLite has builtin support for ISO8601 in its date functions,
> so some folks have started storing dates as ISO8601 SQLite-compatible
> date strings.
> Are
> On Feb 6, 2019, at 2:21 PM, J Decker wrote:
>
> From a JS point of view new Date( ISOString )and .toISOString() are quick
> and available….
Available, yes, but expensive (compared to using a number.)
> ISO format parsing is NOT that hard it's just a minor varient of
> parsing floats.
From a JS point of view new Date( ISOString )and .toISOString() are quick
and available
ISO format parsing is NOT that hard it's just a minor varient of
parsing floats. (maybe the conversion from parts into numeric?)
Haven't bothered to benchmark it.
Date Diffs easily avaialble.
On Wed,
> On Feb 6, 2019, at 11:55 AM, Ben Asher wrote:
>
> Hi there! We're having a debate at my company about date storage in SQLite.
> SQLite has builtin support for ISO8601 in its date functions, so some folks
> have started storing dates as ISO8601 SQLite-compatible date strings. Are
> there
Hi,
Integer unix timestamps are only accurate to one second, where ISO8601
(at least as implemented by SQLite) can go to 1 millisecond. Also you
have to know the epoch to interpret a unix timestamp - not everybody
uses 1970-01-01 00:00:00. Will people be able to figure out what the
field
On 2/6/19 9:10 PM, Richard Hipp wrote:
On 2/6/19, Ben Asher wrote:
Hi there! We're having a debate at my company about date storage in SQLite.
SQLite has builtin support for ISO8601 in its date functions, so some folks
have started storing dates as ISO8601 SQLite-compatible date strings. Are
On 2/6/19, Ben Asher wrote:
> Hi there! We're having a debate at my company about date storage in SQLite.
> SQLite has builtin support for ISO8601 in its date functions, so some folks
> have started storing dates as ISO8601 SQLite-compatible date strings. Are
> there pitfalls to storing dates
On 2/6/19 7:55 PM, Ben Asher wrote:
Hi there! We're having a debate at my company about date storage in SQLite.
SQLite has builtin support for ISO8601 in its date functions, so some folks
have started storing dates as ISO8601 SQLite-compatible date strings. Are
there pitfalls to storing dates
Hi there! We're having a debate at my company about date storage in SQLite.
SQLite has builtin support for ISO8601 in its date functions, so some folks
have started storing dates as ISO8601 SQLite-compatible date strings. Are
there pitfalls to storing dates this way compared to a unix timestamp?
10 matches
Mail list logo
