On Oct 17, 2019, at 4:33 AM, Warren Young wrote:
>
> $ echo 'select count(*) from MyTable where rowid > 1234' |
> nc dbserver
Clarification: that echo line should begin with “Query: “ and end in a
semicolon, which is a short form method of querying a Bedrock DB over the
network. See
On Oct 16, 2019, at 11:42 PM, Peng Yu wrote:
>
> Suppose A is a sqlite3 db file, B is some other file which is
> generated based on the content in A. When A is not changed, there is
> no need to change B, otherwise, B will need to be regenerated. In
> other words, B depends on A, and can be handl
On 17/10/2019 16:42, Peng Yu wrote:
I will need to use the actual files to test for dependency (just as
the dependency that can be used by GNU make)
I don’t understand what that means. You want to use a makefile that checks the
mod date of the database?
Suppose A is a sqlite3 db file, B is s
> > I will need to use the actual files to test for dependency (just as
> > the dependency that can be used by GNU make)
>
> I don’t understand what that means. You want to use a makefile that checks
> the mod date of the database?
Suppose A is a sqlite3 db file, B is some other file which is
gen
—Jens
> On Oct 16, 2019, at 3:37 AM, Peng Yu wrote:
>
> I will need to use the actual files to test for dependency (just as
> the dependency that can be used by GNU make)
I don’t understand what that means. You want to use a makefile that checks the
mod date of the database?
—Jens
On Oct 16, 2019, at 4:08 PM, Warren Young wrote:
>
> I think this project needs someone to fork it.
Sorry, that’s immoderate. It looks like they’ve still got active committers,
so the software isn’t abandonware.
Still, that long list of old issues is a problem. I wonder if the real issue
is
On Oct 16, 2019, at 8:45 AM, Graham Holden wrote:
>
> ...write a pair of what could be relatively simple
> client-server programs that police access to the SQLite DB (which the
> server will be accessing as a local file).
>
> ...
>
> ** I believe someone has tried/succeeded in doing something l
On 2019-10-16 01:47, Peng Yu wrote:
Is there a solution that are known to fill in this niche? Thanks.
Would be clusteded SQLite (distributed SQLite instead of central shared
DB) be a good option for your project? - Bellow, I am pasting my
bookmarks for few well established projects developing
Regarding:
> Why not use an actual client-server database system like MySQL? It's
> optimized for this use case, so it incurs a lot less disk (network)
I/O.
"I will need to use the actual files to test for dependency (just as
the dependency that can be used by GNU make).
...@aldurslair.com]
Sent: Wednesday, October 16, 2019 10:45 AM
To: SQLite mailing list
Subject: Re: [sqlite] Network file system that support sqlite3 well
Wednesday, October 16, 2019, 1:22:58 AM, Gary R. Schmidt
wrote:
> On 16/10/2019 10:38, Jens Alfke wrote:
>>
>>> On Oct 15,
Wednesday, October 16, 2019, 1:22:58 AM, Gary R. Schmidt
wrote:
> On 16/10/2019 10:38, Jens Alfke wrote:
>>
>>> On Oct 15, 2019, at 3:47 PM, Peng Yu wrote:
>>>
>>> I'd like to use sqlite3 db files on many compute nodes. But they
>>> should access the same storage device for the sqlite3 db files
On 16/10/2019 10:38, Jens Alfke wrote:
On Oct 15, 2019, at 3:47 PM, Peng Yu wrote:
I'd like to use sqlite3 db files on many compute nodes. But they
should access the same storage device for the sqlite3 db files.
Why not use an actual client-server database system like MySQL? It's
optimize
-Mobile 4G LTE Device
Original message
From: Peng Yu
Date: 10/16/19 6:41 AM (GMT-05:00)
To: SQLite mailing list
Subject: Re: [sqlite] Network file system that support sqlite3 well
> I know for sure that IBM's GPFS guarantees locking. I think GPFS is "global
> pa
Peng Yu, on Tuesday, October 15, 2019 06:47 PM, wrote...
>
> Hi,
>
> I'd like to use sqlite3 db files on many compute nodes. But they
> should access the same storage device for the sqlite3 db files. The
> directory storing the db files looks the same on any compute node
> logically---the storage
Wednesday, October 16, 2019, 11:43:25 AM, Peng Yu wrote:
> On 10/16/19, Simon Slavin wrote:
>> Unfortunately, no. Multiuser SQLite depends on locking being implemented
>> correctly. The developers haven't found any Network File Systems which do
>> this. Unless one of the readers of this list
On 10/16/19, Simon Slavin wrote:
> On 15 Oct 2019, at 11:47pm, Peng Yu wrote:
>
>> Is there a solution that are known to fill in this niche? Thanks.
>
> Unfortunately, no. Multiuser SQLite depends on locking being implemented
> correctly. The developers haven't found any Network File Systems wh
> I know for sure that IBM's GPFS guarantees locking. I think GPFS is "global
> parallel file system". It is a distributed file system. But it will be
> rather slow. If only few jobs run in parallel, all will be ok. Locking will
> always guarantee database integrity.
>
> With lots of jobs, you wi
> Why not use an actual client-server database system like MySQL? It's
> optimized for this use case, so it incurs a lot less disk (network) I/O.
I will need to use the actual files to test for dependency (just as
the dependency that can be used by GNU make). With just database
tables in MySQL, th
e] Network file system that support sqlite3 well
On 15 Oct 2019, at 11:47pm, Peng Yu wrote:
> Is there a solution that are known to fill in this niche? Thanks.
Unfortunately, no. Multiuser SQLite depends on locking being implemented
correctly. The developers haven't found any Network File
On 15 Oct 2019, at 11:47pm, Peng Yu wrote:
> Is there a solution that are known to fill in this niche? Thanks.
Unfortunately, no. Multiuser SQLite depends on locking being implemented
correctly. The developers haven't found any Network File Systems which do
this. Unless one of the readers o
> On Oct 15, 2019, at 3:47 PM, Peng Yu wrote:
>
> I'd like to use sqlite3 db files on many compute nodes. But they
> should access the same storage device for the sqlite3 db files.
Why not use an actual client-server database system like MySQL? It's optimized
for this use case, so it incurs a
Hi,
I'd like to use sqlite3 db files on many compute nodes. But they
should access the same storage device for the sqlite3 db files. The
directory storing the db files looks the same on any compute node
logically---the storage is mounted at the same mount point on the
compute nodes.
To achieve th
22 matches
Mail list logo
