John Elrick wrote:
John Stanton wrote:
John Elrick wrote:
John Stanton wrote:
I would look at the disk controller/disk drive hardware and the
software driver to see if they are reporting correctly to the OS.
Some of your numbers are too fast for regular disk technology and
suggest
John Stanton wrote:
John Elrick wrote:
John Stanton wrote:
I would look at the disk controller/disk drive hardware and the
software driver to see if they are reporting correctly to the OS.
Some of your numbers are too fast for regular disk technology and
suggest that there are either
John Elrick wrote:
John Stanton wrote:
The real time with the pragma off is 1.78 seconds. The real time on
the "faster" machine is 8.4 seconds. When I set the synchronous
pragma to off on the "faster" machine, the time drops to 1.64.
John
Do your various machines use the same hard disk
John Stanton wrote:
The real time with the pragma off is 1.78 seconds. The real time on
the "faster" machine is 8.4 seconds. When I set the synchronous
pragma to off on the "faster" machine, the time drops to 1.64.
John
Do your various machines use the same hard disk controller and
John Elrick wrote:
John Elrick wrote:
John Elrick wrote:
Griggs, Donald wrote:
John Elrick wrote:
"what the heck is happening that is creating a better than order of
magnitude difference in execution time on five out of seven Windows
machines?".
John,
If the database is
John Elrick wrote:
John Elrick wrote:
Griggs, Donald wrote:
John Elrick wrote:
"what the heck is happening that is creating a better than order of
magnitude difference in execution time on five out of seven Windows
machines?".
John,
If the database is opened and closed just once
6 matches
Mail list logo
