By "version" I meant "implementation".
On Mon, May 3, 2010 at 7:25 AM, Tim Romano wrote:
> Which version of SQLite are you using? If LIKE has been overridden in the
> implementation you're using, it won't have the advantage of an index
> whatever the collation, in which case you might consider G
Hey guys.
For various embarrassing reasons, I'm using:
SELECT x FROM userTable WHERE name LIKE 'name'
To look up entries in my account table. Basically, the scripting
language I'm using which hooks into SQLite is a bit case-agnostic.
I've been told by a friend that this is extremely ineffici
Which version of SQLite are you using? If LIKE has been overridden in the
implementation you're using, it won't have the advantage of an index
whatever the collation, in which case you might consider GLOB though it is
case-sensitive.
Regards
Tim Romano
__
n of SQLite Database
Subject: Re: [sqlite] Optimising usage of LIKE
Simon's answer is probably best -- without any benchmarks it makes the most
sense.
You've got at least two solutions that don't require changing your data:
SELECT x FROM userTable WHERE upper(name) = upper(
;name);
Michael D. Black
Senior Scientist
Northrop Grumman Mission Systems
From: sqlite-users-boun...@sqlite.org on behalf of Simon Slavin
Sent: Mon 5/3/2010 5:33 AM
To: i...@omroth.com; General Discussion of SQLite Database
Subject: Re: [sqlite] Optimisi
On 3 May 2010, at 9:53am, Ian Hardingham wrote:
> For various embarrassing reasons, I'm using:
>
> SELECT x FROM userTable WHERE name LIKE 'name'
>
> To look up entries in my account table. Basically, the scripting
> language I'm using which hooks into SQLite is a bit case-agnostic.
>
> I'v
Hey guys.
For various embarrassing reasons, I'm using:
SELECT x FROM userTable WHERE name LIKE 'name'
To look up entries in my account table. Basically, the scripting
language I'm using which hooks into SQLite is a bit case-agnostic.
I've been told by a friend that this is extremely ineffici
7 matches
Mail list logo
