On 6/1/07, Andrew Finkenstadt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 5/31/07, P Kishor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On 5/31/07, Andrew Finkenstadt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On 5/31/07, P Kishor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > > I realize that I didn't explain the problem well enough (thus is
On 5/31/07, P Kishor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 5/31/07, Andrew Finkenstadt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 5/31/07, P Kishor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > I realize that I didn't explain the problem well enough (thus is the
> > peril of being too close to it for a long time).
> >
> > I
On 5/31/07, Andrew Finkenstadt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 5/31/07, P Kishor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I realize that I didn't explain the problem well enough (thus is the
> peril of being too close to it for a long time).
>
> I can have an (org <--> org) relationship or an (org <-->
On 5/31/07, P Kishor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I realize that I didn't explain the problem well enough (thus is the
peril of being too close to it for a long time).
I can have an (org <--> org) relationship or an (org <--> person)
relationship as well as a (person <--> person) relationship.
On 5/31/07, Igor Tandetnik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
P Kishor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I am modeling entities and their relationships to each other. A
> classic network digraph kind of stuff. The entities are organizations
> or persons. A person may be associated with none (org type
>
P Kishor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I am modeling entities and their relationships to each other. A
classic network digraph kind of stuff. The entities are organizations
or persons. A person may be associated with none (org type
"unassigned") or one organization, and, of course, an organization
6 matches
Mail list logo