Re: [sqlite] Shared memory cache files on disk?

[Dirkjan Ochtman]

On Wed, Aug 29, 2018 at 1:11 AM Keith Medcalf  wrote:

> SQLITE_USE_URI
>
> If this is not defined then URI's are not parsed.
>
> https://www.sqlite.org/uri.html
>

Thank you, that helps a lot!
___
sqlite-users mailing list
sqlite-users@mailinglists.sqlite.org
http://mailinglists.sqlite.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users

Re: [sqlite] Shared memory cache files on disk?

[Keith Medcalf]

SQLITE_USE_URI

If this is not defined then URI's are not parsed.

https://www.sqlite.org/uri.html


---
The fact that there's a Highway to Hell but only a Stairway to Heaven says a 
lot about anticipated traffic volume.

>-Original Message-
>From: sqlite-users [mailto:sqlite-users-
>boun...@mailinglists.sqlite.org] On Behalf Of Dirkjan Ochtman
>Sent: Tuesday, 28 August, 2018 14:25
>To: SQLite mailing list
>Subject: [sqlite] Shared memory cache files on disk?
>
>Hi there,
>
>I've been using in-memory SQLite database for the automated tests in
>an
>application I'm writing. I did most of the initial development on
>macOS and
>things worked as I expected, but when I ran the tests on my Linux box
>it
>left behind files like "file:test-3210?mode=memory=shared".
>
>On my Mac, I have macOS 10.13 with its stock 3.19.3 version of
>SQLite; the
>Linux box is a Gentoo server that has 3.24.0 installed. Is there a
>compile-time option that could explain this difference, or is there
>some
>other subtle platform difference that I'm missing?
>
>Regards,
>
>Dirkjan
>___
>sqlite-users mailing list
>sqlite-users@mailinglists.sqlite.org
>http://mailinglists.sqlite.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users



___
sqlite-users mailing list
sqlite-users@mailinglists.sqlite.org
http://mailinglists.sqlite.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users

[sqlite] Shared memory cache files on disk?

[Dirkjan Ochtman]

Hi there,

I've been using in-memory SQLite database for the automated tests in an
application I'm writing. I did most of the initial development on macOS and
things worked as I expected, but when I ran the tests on my Linux box it
left behind files like "file:test-3210?mode=memory=shared".

On my Mac, I have macOS 10.13 with its stock 3.19.3 version of SQLite; the
Linux box is a Gentoo server that has 3.24.0 installed. Is there a
compile-time option that could explain this difference, or is there some
other subtle platform difference that I'm missing?

Regards,

Dirkjan
___
sqlite-users mailing list
sqlite-users@mailinglists.sqlite.org
http://mailinglists.sqlite.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users