Re: [sqlite] Significance of Sqlite version?

2008-12-02 Thread D. Richard Hipp

On Dec 2, 2008, at 11:55 AM, Brandon, Nicholas (UK) wrote:

>
> I note recently that the SQLite version has gone from a 3 point number
> (i.e. 3.6.2) to a 4 point number (i.e. 3.6.6.2).

3.6.6.1 and 3.6.6.2 were branch releases to address emergency issues.   
The next version will be 3.6.7.

>
>
> Should I read any significance into this change? Is there going to be
> two strands to development/release of SQLite or will the current
> practice of the 'latest is the best' still remain true?
>
> Regards
> Nick
>
>
> 
> This email and any attachments are confidential to the intended
> recipient and may also be privileged. If you are not the intended
> recipient please delete it from your system and notify the sender.
> You should not copy it or use it for any purpose nor disclose or
> distribute its contents to any other person.
> 
>
> ___
> sqlite-users mailing list
> sqlite-users@sqlite.org
> http://sqlite.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users

D. Richard Hipp
[EMAIL PROTECTED]



___
sqlite-users mailing list
sqlite-users@sqlite.org
http://sqlite.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users


[sqlite] Significance of Sqlite version?

2008-12-02 Thread Brandon, Nicholas (UK)

I note recently that the SQLite version has gone from a 3 point number
(i.e. 3.6.2) to a 4 point number (i.e. 3.6.6.2).

Should I read any significance into this change? Is there going to be
two strands to development/release of SQLite or will the current
practice of the 'latest is the best' still remain true?

Regards
Nick



This email and any attachments are confidential to the intended
recipient and may also be privileged. If you are not the intended
recipient please delete it from your system and notify the sender.
You should not copy it or use it for any purpose nor disclose or
distribute its contents to any other person.


___
sqlite-users mailing list
sqlite-users@sqlite.org
http://sqlite.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users