Re: [sqlite] Sqlite Step Strange Results

2010-02-25 Thread D. Richard Hipp
On Feb 25, 2010, at 10:19 AM, Rob Read wrote: > We are using sqlite in a low memory environment and as such have > been using > the MEMSYS5 memory allocator. This has been working great to confine > our > memory usage to the buffer that gets passed during start time. I have > recently run

Re: [sqlite] Sqlite Step Strange Results

2010-02-25 Thread Pavel Ivanov
Could it be because of fragmentation issues? When you allow more cache pages to be allocated you allow more fragmentation to be introduced. And although in total there could be enough memory available there could still be no solid block of sufficient size available. >From the comment in mem5.c:

[sqlite] Sqlite Step Strange Results

2010-02-25 Thread Rob Read
We are using sqlite in a low memory environment and as such have been using the MEMSYS5 memory allocator. This has been working great to confine our memory usage to the buffer that gets passed during start time. I have recently run into some strange results while doing a step to insert a blob into