Re: [sqlite] Using Sqlite in place of BDB

- From: Lawrence Gold <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Wednesday, September 10, 2008 3:29 am Subject: [sqlite] Using Sqlite in place of BDB > Hello, > > I work for a company which is seeking to replace its homegrown > database engine with a more robust, modern engine. I've looked

Re: [sqlite] Using Sqlite in place of BDB

I would strongly consider using normal sqlite to store your key values pairs. do you have a performance spec that you need to meet that would not allow that? Also you could just try it out to see if it is "good enough". On Tue, Sep 9, 2008 at 2:59 PM, Lawrence Gold <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >

[sqlite] Using Sqlite in place of BDB

Hello, I work for a company which is seeking to replace its homegrown database engine with a more robust, modern engine. I've looked at BerkeleyDB, which would be ideal since all we really need are key/ value pairs for our records and indexes, but its cost is rather prohibitive. At this