Re: [sqlite] smaller sqlite execuatble?

Hi, Thanks I've tried building using the options below (compiler cmd line) -Dxxx The object files will be built, but it appears that none of the required objects are being created. Using only these functions: sqlite3_open() sqlite3_exec() sqlite3_free() sqlite3_close() Here's the compiler

Re: [sqlite] smaller sqlite execuatble?

"When I compile on my linux box (SuSE 10.1) using GCC 4.1.0 and leaving out all the optional featuers of SQLite, I get a library size of less than 166 KiB." I would be very curious to know how exactly you leave out optional features. If I write even a simple program using only the barest of

Re: [sqlite] smaller sqlite execuatble?

tim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > I'm developing on an arm-elf platform that uses a flat binary (elf2flt) > (mmu-less processor) and the smallest executable I'm able to generate > runs about 599k. Also it tends to want an equal amount of memory at > run-time, which the board > will not

[sqlite] smaller sqlite execuatble?

Hi, I'm developing on an arm-elf platform that uses a flat binary (elf2flt) (mmu-less processor) and the smallest executable I'm able to generate runs about 599k. Also it tends to want an equal amount of memory at run-time, which the board will not support (on top of the already running