> I can’t think of any cases where these would happen if everything was
working as planned.
I can't think of anything either and this is all fully tested, so I think I
can leave these checks out.
> From what I can see, you’re executing a long series of queries, each of
which you expect to return
On 28 May 2017, at 12:14pm, Gwendal Roué wrote:
> I personnally call sqlite3_reset before sqlite3_clear_bingings with great
> success, but I don't know if the order is relevant or not.
It makes more sense to move sqlite3_clear_bindings() to before you set
parameters
The documentation (https://www.sqlite.org/c3ref/reset.html) seems to
suggest that sqlite3_reset can only be unsuccessful if sqlite3_step
returned an error.
Not sure about sqlite3_clear_bindings.
I will do some testing and see if there is any performance gain in leaving
these checks out. Very
> Le 28 mai 2017 à 13:24, Bart Smissaert a écrit :
>
>> Calling sqlite3_clear_bindings does the same thing as calling
> sqlite3_bind_null for all arguments.
>
> Yes, I understand that, just thinking about efficiency.
Then I don't know. Your experience will tell.
>>
> Calling sqlite3_clear_bindings does the same thing as calling
sqlite3_bind_null for all arguments.
Yes, I understand that, just thinking about efficiency.
> I personnally call sqlite3_reset before sqlite3_clear_bingings with great
success
I am doing the same now. Probably no difference there
Hello Bart,
> Le 28 mai 2017 à 13:03, Bart Smissaert a écrit :
>
> Using SQLite3 3.19.0 on a Windows machine.
> I have some general questions about sqlite3_reset and
> sqlite3_clear_bindings:
> I am processing data from a 2D variant array (this is VB6).
>
> 1. I
Using SQLite3 3.19.0 on a Windows machine.
I have some general questions about sqlite3_reset and
sqlite3_clear_bindings:
I am processing data from a 2D variant array (this is VB6).
1. I understand that after processing a row (binding all the values in a
row of that variant array)
I need to do
Philip Van Hoof wrote:
> When we use our custom SQLite function function_sparql_regex (lower in
> this E-mail) together with bound values for the argvs of the function,
> then sqlite3_reset nor sqlite3_clear_bindings are clearning the
> auxdata.
>
> This makes it impossible to
Hi there,
When we use our custom SQLite function function_sparql_regex (lower in
this E-mail) together with bound values for the argvs of the function,
then sqlite3_reset nor sqlite3_clear_bindings are clearning the auxdata.
This makes it impossible to pass the regex as a sqlite3_bind_text (the
9 matches
Mail list logo