RE: [sqlite] uSQLite, doing HTTP

2005-11-18 Thread johns
Quoting [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > > > > > Agree in principle with what you're saying here as well, one suggestion > > - perhaps you could mod your server to accept/general queries/output via > > standard in/out. That way its could be piped over a multitude of channels. > > > > Cheers - Lindsay >

Re: [sqlite] uSQLite, doing HTTP

2005-11-17 Thread Lindsay
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Agree in principle with what you're saying here as well, one suggestion - perhaps you could mod your server to accept/general queries/output via standard in/out. That way its could be piped over a multitude of channels. Cheers - Lindsay The

RE: [sqlite] uSQLite, doing HTTP

2005-11-17 Thread roger
> > Agree in principle with what you're saying here as well, one suggestion > - perhaps you could mod your server to accept/general queries/output via > standard in/out. That way its could be piped over a multitude of channels. > > Cheers - Lindsay The architecture would be all wrong for

[sqlite] uSQLite, doing HTTP

2005-11-16 Thread roger
HTTP started with the idea that it would be possible to connect via HTTP, for tunneling purposes. I have been looking at the links and suggestions and have reached the following conclusions:- 1) Adding general purpose web server capabilities in uSQL would be a mistake. The purpose is to add