I would actually remove the default or use the process name instead. Just my $0.02. Mike
-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- Von: John Stanton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Gesendet: Mittwoch, 1. November 2006 01:28 An: sqlite-users@sqlite.org Betreff: Re: [sqlite] SQLite and McAfee Anti-Virus Why not make it McAfee and direct the complaints to the culprits? Joe Wilson wrote: > Even better - name the temp file prefix msaccess_ and no one will dare > touch it or question it. > > ----- Original Message ---- > From: James Berry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: sqlite-users@sqlite.org > Sent: Tuesday, October 31, 2006 6:14:11 PM > Subject: Re: [sqlite] SQLite and McAfee Anti-Virus > > On Oct 31, 2006, at 2:24 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > >> only people in >>the know will figure out 'sqlite' is 'etilqs' backwards and, as you >>point out, > > > You're assuming that Google won't find this thread, which is now > public record. Soon a search for (that new word) will get back to > sqlite anyway... ;) > > -jdb > > > > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > ------- To unsubscribe, send email to > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > ------- > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- - To unsubscribe, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- - ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
