ilding
products. Position is in the Washington D.C. metro area. If interested
contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, April 17, 2007 11:18 AM
To: sqlite-users@sqlite.org
Subject: Re: [sqlite] Insert order maintained?
&g
> I know this is the behavior for MySQL, but not sure about SQLite.
I'v heard about some version of mysql that didn't return rows in the same
order (but haven't seen it myselt). So unless this behaviour is documented
in mysql manual, it's not a good idea to rely on this. Actually I'v seen
PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, April 17, 2007 11:18 AM
To: sqlite-users@sqlite.org
Subject: Re: [sqlite] Insert order maintained?
> I know this is the behavior for MySQL, but not sure about SQLite.
I'v heard about some vers
Additionally, note that if you use ORDER BY, and it _is_ in the
indicated order already, then sqlite will optimize the ORDER BY away
entirely. So use ORDER BY.
-scott
On 4/17/07, Andrew Finkenstadt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
The order of the rows returned by a select that does not have an
The order of the rows returned by a select that does not have an ORDER BY
clause is guaranteed by the standard to be in any arbitrary order, even from
one execution to another due to changes in the underlying data, index
statistics, amount of memory available, or even the phase of the moon.
Use
5 matches
Mail list logo