Re: [sqlite] Insert order maintained?

2007-04-17 Thread Alberto Simões
ilding products. Position is in the Washington D.C. metro area. If interested contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, April 17, 2007 11:18 AM To: sqlite-users@sqlite.org Subject: Re: [sqlite] Insert order maintained? &g

Re: [sqlite] Insert order maintained?

2007-04-17 Thread BardzoTajneKonto
> I know this is the behavior for MySQL, but not sure about SQLite. I'v heard about some version of mysql that didn't return rows in the same order (but haven't seen it myselt). So unless this behaviour is documented in mysql manual, it's not a good idea to rely on this. Actually I'v seen

RE: [sqlite] Insert order maintained?

2007-04-17 Thread Samuel R. Neff
PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, April 17, 2007 11:18 AM To: sqlite-users@sqlite.org Subject: Re: [sqlite] Insert order maintained? > I know this is the behavior for MySQL, but not sure about SQLite. I'v heard about some vers

Re: [sqlite] Insert order maintained?

2007-04-17 Thread Scott Hess
Additionally, note that if you use ORDER BY, and it _is_ in the indicated order already, then sqlite will optimize the ORDER BY away entirely. So use ORDER BY. -scott On 4/17/07, Andrew Finkenstadt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: The order of the rows returned by a select that does not have an

Re: [sqlite] Insert order maintained?

2007-04-17 Thread Andrew Finkenstadt
The order of the rows returned by a select that does not have an ORDER BY clause is guaranteed by the standard to be in any arbitrary order, even from one execution to another due to changes in the underlying data, index statistics, amount of memory available, or even the phase of the moon. Use