Re: [sqlite] Re: File Syste

2006-12-14 Thread Eduardo Morras
At 22:03 13/12/2006, you wrote: I am developing a File System, and I'd like to use B+ Tree and not lost time and CPU understanding SQL... Check HFS(16/32 bits) and HFS+(64 bits) filesystems from Apple, they use B+ trees. The code is open source and you can find it on Darwin repository. ---

Re: [sqlite] Re: File Syste

2006-12-13 Thread John Stanton
If you are using a B-Tree index for a file system why incorporate Sqlite, why not just write the file system code? B-Trees are well documented. Cesar Rodas wrote: I am developing a File System, and I'd like to use B+ Tree and not lost time and CPU understanding SQL... On 13/12/06, John St

Re: [sqlite] Re: File Syste

2006-12-13 Thread Nicolas Williams
On Wed, Dec 13, 2006 at 05:03:50PM -0400, Cesar Rodas wrote: > On 13/12/06, John Stanton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > >It is hard to imagine why you would want to use Sqlite B-Tree access. > > I am developing a File System, and I'd like to use B+ Tree and not lost time > and CPU understanding

Re: [sqlite] Re: File Syste

2006-12-13 Thread Cesar Rodas
I am developing a File System, and I'd like to use B+ Tree and not lost time and CPU understanding SQL... On 13/12/06, John Stanton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: It is hard to imagine why you would want to use Sqlite B-Tree access. Kees Nuyt wrote: > On Wed, 13 Dec 2006 13:02:37 -0400, you wrot

Re: [sqlite] Re: File Syste

2006-12-13 Thread John Stanton
It is hard to imagine why you would want to use Sqlite B-Tree access. Kees Nuyt wrote: On Wed, 13 Dec 2006 13:02:37 -0400, you wrote: I mean the SQLite Core API, something like Berkeley DB. I'd like to use SQLite B+tree API. It has quite recently been discussed, you may want to try to sear

Re: [sqlite] Re: File Syste

2006-12-13 Thread Kees Nuyt
On Wed, 13 Dec 2006 13:02:37 -0400, you wrote: > I mean the SQLite Core API, something like Berkeley DB. > I'd like to use SQLite B+tree API. It has quite recently been discussed, you may want to try to search the mailing list archives. The conclusion was: the B+tree API is usable but it is easy

Re: [sqlite] Re: File Syste

2006-12-13 Thread John Stanton
The Sqlite API is fully documented and the source code is clearly written and commented and reads quite simply as a definition of its philosophy and function. Cesar Rodas wrote: I mean.. is there a manual that explain how to use SQLite Core in low level API, like berkeley DB, without SQL. Tha

Re: [sqlite] Re: File Syste

2006-12-13 Thread Cesar Rodas
I mean the SQLite Core API, something like Berkeley DB. I'd like to use SQLite B+tree API. On 13/12/06, Pat Wibbeler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: The public C API is well-documented here: http://www.sqlite.org/capi3.html There may be other documentation of the internals, but I'd imagine the publ

RE: [sqlite] Re: File Syste

2006-12-13 Thread Pat Wibbeler
The public C API is well-documented here: http://www.sqlite.org/capi3.html There may be other documentation of the internals, but I'd imagine the public API will get you pretty far. Pat -Original Message- From: Cesar Rodas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, December 13, 2006 6: