Legacy applications should continue to work. You might get a
compiler warning about a type mismatch on the 2nd parameter to
sqlite3_trace(). But calling a 2-parameter function with 3
parameters is suppose to be harmless in C.
It's not allowed by the standard, so it will almost certainly
Jorge Pereira [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I execute this query below, following result.
sqlite SELECT
si.CD_CURR_SALE_ITEM,si.QT_SALE_ITEM,p.CD_IDEN_PROD,p.NM_PRODFROM
Current_sale_item si, Product p WHERE
si.CD_PROD = p.CD_PROD;
CD_CURR_SALE_ITEM|QT_SALE_ITEM|CD_IDEN_PROD|NM_PROD
Hi
sno | id | amount
1| 1 | 200
2| 1 | 300
3 | 2 | 100
4 | 2 | 100
5 | 1 | 500
how could I subtract the sno 1 id 1 and sno 2 id 1 amount .
select
(select amount from tableName where sno=1 and id=1) -
(select amount from tableName where sno=2 and
Joe Wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- D. Richard Hipp [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sorry for the confusion.
No problem.
For what it's worth, I am also curious as to the final form of the
VM opcode transformation. The number of opcodes generated by the various
SQL statements seems to be
Bill KING [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
A colleague brought up a very good point. At least for the first few
revisions, is the old engine/code still going to be available until the
new engine code base settles down?
You can always pull the old code frm CVS and run it against
the newer code. We
This is my 2 cents. Maybe there's better way to do this:
select
id,
amount,
(select amount from tablename where id=t.id and sno t.sno limit 1)
as oldAmount
from tablename t
br
Radzi.
On 14-Jan-2008, at 8:14 PM, Vishal Mailinglist wrote:
Hi
sno | id | amount
1|
Mohd Radzi Ibrahim [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
This is my 2 cents. Maybe there's better way to do this:
select
id,
amount,
(select amount from tablename where id=t.id and sno t.sno limit 1)
as oldAmount
from tablename t
In the subselect, you probably want order by sno desc
Igor Tandetnik
Hello,
SQLite seems to be accepting SELECT queries that use aggregate functions
without a GROUP BY. This is a little dangerous, because queries that
should not work at all are returning sensible-looking results.
Example:
Let's have a simple table T with the following structure and
I've fed editable wxGrids with several different data sources. The
principle would be the same with SQLite as with any other. You get the
most control by using the two-layer approach of deriving from
wxGridTableBase. When editing moves to another row you write your
updates/new record.
Clay
I found some answer to my previous questions and wrote a short tutorial
at http://source.online.free.fr/Linux_HowToCompileSQLite.html
a .o file is a collection of compiled code called an 'object' file.
A library file
is very similar but includes a directory so some of the file can be
included
Hi all,
I have a string of type 080110 17:32:34 where.08 refers year in yy format
and 01 refers to month(mm) jan and 10 refers date(dd).
I want to insert this into SQLite as any standard timestamp format such as
-mm-dd HH:MM:SS or unixepoch etc.. Is it possible to
do this?
Please Help
Thanks
I've run into this issue myself and had more trouble than necessary tracking
down problems related to it. Personally I would consider it a bug, but it's
been discussed hear as accepted behavior.
Sam
---
We're Hiring! Seeking a passionate developer to
manohar s [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have a string of type 080110 17:32:34 where.08 refers year in yy
format and 01 refers to month(mm) jan and 10 refers date(dd).
I want to insert this into SQLite as any standard timestamp format
such as -mm-dd HH:MM:SS or unixepoch etc.. Is it possible to
Can't you just perform a few simple string manipulations in your
application to turn 080110 into 2008-01-10?
Exactly what I was about to suggest. I do it the other way around. One of
my table columns has to contain dates, some of which are incomplete, for
example March 2001 [the table
-Original Message-
From: Nicolas Williams [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, January 14, 2008 10:29 AM
To: sqlite-users@sqlite.org
Subject: Re: [sqlite] Next Version of SQLite
On Sun, Jan 13, 2008 at 08:46:03PM -0600, Rick Langschultz wrote:
I was wondering what would
On Sun, Jan 13, 2008 at 08:46:03PM -0600, Rick Langschultz wrote:
I was wondering what would constitute the creation of SQLite 4.0?
IMO major implementation details changes are not necessarily a good
rationale for bumping the major version number, not from a user's p.o.v.
The authors might think
On Mon, Jan 14, 2008 at 10:55:42AM -0600, Fred Williams wrote:
Which means that if the major version number changes,
then it'll be for marketing purposes.
Well seeing how SQLite is FREE, it does its own marketing with one
word, so to speak. Therefore I doubt marketing will
This issue is debated from time to time on the list:
http://www.mail-archive.com/sqlite-users@sqlite.org/msg17769.html
The only other database that I'm aware of that supports selecting
non-aggregates that are not listed in GROUP BY is MySQL:
-- valid in sqlite and mysql, invalid in postgres
@SQLiteParameter = 'a','b','c'
WHERE SomeColumn IN (@SQLiteParameter)
Is there a way to accomplish this type of query? In SQL Server I remember
writing a function that translated a list of strings to a table in memory
that would satisfy the IN clause.
R
--
View this message in context:
idkfa [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
@SQLiteParameter = 'a','b','c'
WHERE SomeColumn IN (@SQLiteParameter)
Is there a way to accomplish this type of query?
WHERE @SQLiteParameter LIKE ('%''' || SomeColumn || '''%')
Not very fast though (in particular, it can't use an index on SomeColumn
if there
Hello all,
This isn't s question specific to SQLite, so I hope that you don't mind...
but, I am trying to store an ordered lists of numbers of arbitrary length in
a table. I am not really sure what the best method of doing this, but the
way that I have come up with is to create a table with the
Hi Jose,
On Sun, 13 Jan 2008 23:47:04 -0500, jose isaias cabrera
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Kees Nuyt trying to help me said...
On Fri, 11 Jan 2008 15:32:28 -0500, jose isaias cabrera
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Greetings.
I have a problem. I have this shared DB amongst 4 co-workers where I
Depending upon your needs an alternative would be to store the numbers list as
a blob. Then the list can be retrieved as a single select.
Just an idea.
Ken
Mike McGonagle [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello all,
This isn't s question specific to SQLite, so I hope that you don't mind...
but, I am
Kees Nuyt helped with...
Hi Jose,
On Sun, 13 Jan 2008 23:47:04 -0500, jose isaias cabrera
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Kees Nuyt trying to help me said...
On Fri, 11 Jan 2008 15:32:28 -0500, jose isaias cabrera
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Greetings.
I have a problem. I have this shared DB
Hi,
I'm a newb when it comes to database design, so please forgive me if
this question is obvious.
With sqlite (or any database 'mysql') if you have a table, can you
insert thousands, millions, billions,... of rows? I know this all
depends on the details, but I'm just trying to get an idea.
That definitely worked as you described, thank you. However, performance is
key for us. We'll need to fire off a query like that at a steady 15hz
heartbeat (a WHERE NOT IN actually). Could you suggest a faster equivalent
to accomplish such a task?
What about dumping the string list into a
idkfa [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What about dumping the string list into a #TempTable and then firing
off a SELECT WHERE NOT IN (SELECT value FROM #TempTable)?
By all means, go right ahead.
Igor Tandetnik
-
To
Bob Rossi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
With sqlite (or any database 'mysql') if you have a table, can you
insert thousands, millions, billions,... of rows?
Yes, though billions is pushing it for an embedded database like
SQLite.
Also, say you index one of the columns, and there are millions of
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Bill KING [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
A colleague brought up a very good point. At least for the first few
revisions, is the old engine/code still going to be available until the
new engine code base settles down?
You can always pull the old code frm CVS and
On Mon, Jan 14, 2008 at 03:54:36PM -0500, Igor Tandetnik wrote:
Bob Rossi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Also, say you index one of the columns, and there are millions of rows
in the database, but each unique index has 100 items. If you search
for
a particular index, what is the Big O notation
Bob Rossi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Jan 14, 2008 at 03:54:36PM -0500, Igor Tandetnik wrote:
Bob Rossi
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Also, say you index one of the columns, and there are millions of
rows in the database, but each unique index has 100 items. If you
search for
a particular
At 3:14 PM +0200 1/14/08, Lauri Nurmi wrote:
SQLite seems to be accepting SELECT queries that use aggregate
functions without a GROUP BY. This is a little dangerous, because
queries that should not work at all are returning sensible-looking
results.
snip
sqlite SELECT MAX(a), b FROM T;
Hi Duncan,
Regarding: A DBMS accepting such queries isn't just a little
dangerous, its flat out wrong. I would ask what rationale there is for
this query not failing. -- Darren Duncan
I'm not asserting that you have to agree with the rationale, but did you
see and read the discussion that Joe
At 10:17 PM -0500 1/14/08, Griggs, Donald wrote:
Hi Duncan,
Regarding: A DBMS accepting such queries isn't just a little
dangerous, its flat out wrong. I would ask what rationale there is for
this query not failing. -- Darren Duncan
I'm not asserting that you have to agree with the
Some relational (PostgreSQL for example) databases allow you to store
arbitrary array as a field in on row. So your retrieval would be much
easier.
Also depending on your performance requirements you can store your
numbers in CSV format in the single text filed. The search for the
group
--- Darren Duncan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
At 10:17 PM -0500 1/14/08, Griggs, Donald wrote:
Regarding: A DBMS accepting such queries isn't just a little
dangerous, its flat out wrong. I would ask what rationale there is for
this query not failing. -- Darren Duncan
I'm not asserting that
36 matches
Mail list logo
