Select * from a table took just slightly under three hours.
Select * from a reconstructed table (insert into select from) in a new
database took 57 seconds.
I think it's not related to fragmentation, but to fill percentage of
b-tree pages. I guess your reconstructed table is
It seems legitimate to use the idx_foobar because it is already
sorted.. no?
Yes, it is sorted. So for example you have 2 values and you need to
put them in order. You know that these values exist somewhere in the
index in exact order you need. How would you find the order? You'll
need to scan
search of a value in the middle of the index.
Pavel
On Wed, Oct 20, 2010 at 11:10 AM, Mathieu Schroeter
schroe...@epsitec.ch wrote:
Le 20.10.2010 16:44, Pavel Ivanov a écrit :
It seems legitimate to use the idx_foobar because it is already
sorted.. no?
Yes, it is sorted. So for example you
2. I suggest that you're better off doing the logic entirely in SQL, rather
than application code, for the sake of portability, data integrity and speed.
I'd say this is a very bad advice for the developer using SQLite.
First of all insert or ignore and insert or replace are not
portable SQL
In pcache1Fetch, sqlite mutexes around the cache handling, which appears to
be causing significant waits/scalability issues in my application. If I
disable this mutex, the application crashes.
Why do you think that this mutex causes significant waits?
Anyway ...
Is it possible to cache on
that there is zero waiting.
-Jeff
-Original Message-
From: sqlite-users-boun...@sqlite.org
[mailto:sqlite-users-boun...@sqlite.org] On Behalf Of Pavel Ivanov
Sent: Monday, October 18, 2010 12:03 PM
To: General Discussion of SQLite Database
Subject: Re: [sqlite] Scaling of Cache
sqlite create table c(achr char,bchr char);
sqlite create index c_chr on c(achr,bchr);
sqlite explain query plan select achr,bchr from c where achr=bchr;
0|0|TABLE c
Why no use of the index in this case?
How do you think it should be used here? It's not that rows with the
same values of
Now I decide that I want a second type of insert, so I try to use a
prepared statement for that as well. However it always fails. As long as
the other prepared statement is hanging round I can't prepare a new one.
Does this seem right or am I really soing something wrong?
You are doing
on behalf of Pavel Ivanov
Sent: Fri 10/15/2010 8:27 AM
To: General Discussion of SQLite Database
Subject: EXTERNAL:Re: [sqlite] How to optimize a multi-condition query
sqlite create table c(achr char,bchr char);
sqlite create index c_chr on c(achr,bchr);
sqlite explain query plan select
This is most probably a corruption where index have some rowids not
present in table. If nothing else is corrupted you can just drop the
index and recreate it again.
Pavel
On Fri, Oct 15, 2010 at 1:43 PM, Jeff Flanigan jflani...@zimbra.com wrote:
Cool, that definitely tells me the db is
Is this legal to have a foreign key that references several tables?
Why not? I'd say it's a very bad database design (or extremely rare
and questionable reason to do that) but there's nothing wrong in it
from SQL point of view.
Pavel
On Wed, Oct 13, 2010 at 6:55 AM, TP
Michele,
Here is another thought for you to consider. Apparently your
application consistently generates some records, each record is marked
with a timestamp of its creation and after some time you have to
garbage-collect all records that are at least at a certain amount of
time in the past. You
I'm porting an Interbase DB to SQLIte and wondered if there is any way to
store temporary values within a trigger?
No. You should use (temporary) tables created outside the trigger for
that. Or you can move the trigger logic into your application.
Pavel
On Thu, Oct 7, 2010 at 4:26 AM,
But the rows he wants to delete are those with DateTimecutoffdate. So
without an index on that column SQL can't find which rows to delete quickly !
Quickly is appropriate for one row. For several rows SQLite will
sequentially scan the index and for each rowid found there it will
traverse the
2. In between with another statement handle if I update the table, here I
am updating the record which is just fetches by my cursor mentioned in
step 1.
You shouldn't do that. It's a bad idea in general and it leads to
undefined results in SQLite specifically.
- Ultimately, its fetching
I can't say anything about your particular issue with the LIMIT
clause, maybe that's a bug. But
Another solution is to use UNION instead of UNION ALL. But I can't use that,
because UNION does not respect ORDER BY in sub-statements (not sure if it's
a correct behavior).
Do you know that SELECT
There's no contradiction in those citations. First talks about website
with some 100K hits/day. Website means application running on some
dedicated server, clients send HTTP requests to your application and
application processes it working with locally stored database. Second
citation is talking
Apparently you are calling sqlite3_free twice on the same statement
pointer. Try to add assigning to NULL after freeing and checking for
NULL before freeing.
Pavel
On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 10:57 AM, Borra, Kishore Babu
kishorebabu.bo...@adc.com wrote:
Hi,
I require some help in getting the
I know the literal GUID value shown is correct, as I copied it directly from
the results pane when I do a SELECT * FROM UserRole, however, as soon as I
add the WHERE clause, I get no results.
Execute 'SELECT UserId, typeof(UserId) FROM UserRole' preferably from
sqlite command line utility
sqlite can reach in a request?
Il 21/09/2010 19.31, Pavel Ivanov ha scritto:
Is Sqlite somewhere caching data? If so, how do I disable it or decrease
the amount of cached data?
http://www.sqlite.org/pragma.html#pragma_cache_size
Pavel
On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 1:24 PM, Richard Wähneltdeslo
Is it ok for cache to behave like this or some optimization is possible to
fix this?
For this particular case I believe you can do some optimization by
making your own implementation of cache.
Also I believe such strange behavior of cache is pretty much
explainable. Remember that standard
at 7:12 PM, Pavel Ivanov paiva...@gmail.com wrote:
Is it ok for cache to behave like this or some optimization is possible
to
fix this?
For this particular case I believe you can do some optimization by
making your own implementation of cache.
Also I believe such strange behavior of cache
Is Sqlite somewhere caching data? If so, how do I disable it or decrease the
amount of cached data?
http://www.sqlite.org/pragma.html#pragma_cache_size
Pavel
On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 1:24 PM, Richard Wähnelt deslo...@web.de wrote:
Hello there,
I hope, someone can help me with the problem
sqlite select sic, sic_desc, state, count(*) from Companies group by
sic;
The 'group by' phrase returns one row per group, which is what I want as
long as the group is a compound of industry number and state (the
description makes it easier to read and is fixed in association with
Did you by any chance introduced some unique constraint or unique
index on a set of columns one of which is primary key? AFAIK, there
was a problem in SQLite until some recent versions in processing of
redundant unique constraints in conjunction with natural joins.
But the best idea would be to
I intended to use sqlite3_bind_int() to bind the maximal number of employees
a department can contain to the template. The C program works without error.
However, the trigger does not work when I insert into the employees table.
I used the latest sqlite-3.7.2. Is this a bug of SQLite? Or did
My reason for doing this is, if a field is null, I still need to know
what class it 'should' have been if it had been storing a value.
Why do you need that? No matter what you declare field can store any
type of data. And in SQLite there's no declared storage class. You
are talking either about
The correct syntax is
UPDATE sites SET createTime = DATETIME('NOW'), updateTime =
DATETIME('NOW')
WHERE rowid = new.rowid;
So I wonder if you made a typo and actually only createTime were
updated when updateTime remained unchanged.
Pavel
On Thu, Sep 2, 2010 at 3:11 PM, Michael Graßl
I have set up a test program without QtSql and could not reproduce any of
the performance degradations. So the problem has nothing to do with sqlite.
Sorry for the noise.
I guess Qt either ignores some of your pragmas, or resets their values
to what it thinks is better. Also I'm afraid it
And we can't have the entire implementation on the
WebKit/Chrome side either, because then we can't compile against vanilla
SQLite (and Linux distributions don't like it).
Could you explain in detail where this can't comes from and what's
the problem with Richard's suggestion to copy necessary
Is this intended behaviour? How does the pragma/async io module fit in,
then?
I believe you've got something wrong in your tests. Because with
asynchronous module (if you indeed used its VFS when created your
connections) no actual disk I/O happens in the same thread as insert
command. With
In my code, I delete the view before attempting to recreate it by
executing the prepared statement. Isn't that the time to validate
whether there are semantic problems with the statement?
Yes, validation happens only at the time of execution. So you are
apparently doing something wrong and
I'm sorry to ask this, but can you check for us whether a VIEW by that name
really does exist ? Don't forget, VIEWs get saved in the file, they're not
part of the attachment.
Yes it does
So you are trying to create a VIEW which does already exist. In that case,
there's no mystery
Nikolaus,
I've traced your application a bit (with SQLite 3.6.18 sources) and
it looks like SQLite does some nasty thing nobody in this thread
expected. For some reason while doing first delete SQLite actually
commits transaction and degrades lock to SHARED. Then of course second
delete cannot
wrote:
On Aug 25, 2010, at 10:40 PM, Pavel Ivanov wrote:
Nikolaus,
I've traced your application a bit (with SQLite 3.6.18 sources) and
it looks like SQLite does some nasty thing nobody in this thread
expected. For some reason while doing first delete SQLite actually
commits transaction
Make it your rule of thumb: don't ever use rowid, declare your own
column as integer primary key and use it. It will come at no cost
for you and everything else will work much better.
Here is simplified example of your problem and solution:
sqlite pragma foreign_keys=on;
sqlite create table t (n
I can't understand why is it a bad practice to use database-provided features?
You can use it when you are selecting. And even in this case you
should use caution because without explicit column declared by you
SQLite can change rowids without notice. And for foreign keys it's
mandatory to
I don't know what you mean by 'cursor'. SQLite has commands. You execute
one command at a time. Even a command like a SELECT that gathers lots of
data gathers the data all in one go, then finishes. SQLite does not mark its
place with one command, then return to that place again with
SQLite allows multiple readers, or exactly one wrier, accessing the database
at the same time. You can't read and write simultaneously, you must arrange
for your connections to take turns. SQLITE_BUSY error is a signal for you to
back off, wait a little, then try again. See also
/new data
from the other thread?
Michael D. Black
Senior Scientist
Advanced Analytics Directorate
Northrop Grumman Information Systems
From: sqlite-users-boun...@sqlite.org on behalf of Pavel Ivanov
Sent: Wed 8/18/2010 9:15 AM
To: General Discussion
?
Michael D. Black
Senior Scientist
Advanced Analytics Directorate
Northrop Grumman Information Systems
From: sqlite-users-boun...@sqlite.org on behalf of Pavel Ivanov
Sent: Wed 8/18/2010 9:57 AM
To: General Discussion of SQLite Database
Subject
Summary: how can I use foreign keys across database boundaries? Is it at
all possible?
No. It's logically incorrect action, so it's impossible. If you want
consistency of your tables to be automatically checked by database
engine you need to allow that engine to see those tables at all times.
oli...@f-prot.com wrote:
Hello Pavel,
thanks for your reply.
On 2010-08-18 20:39, Pavel Ivanov wrote:
Summary: how can I use foreign keys across database boundaries? Is it at
all possible?
No. It's logically incorrect action, so it's impossible. If you want
consistency of your tables
I don't understand where do you see a problem but it looks like this
join will do what you want:
select * from A, B
where A.name = B.name
and A.left B.right
and A.right B.left
I could use an external program (such as python
sqlite package) to enumerate all the named interval from table A and
just (name). But
cases when those indices would help are very specific, so in general
your only option is index on name only.
Pavel
On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 12:48 PM, Peng Yu pengyu...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 11:32 AM, Pavel Ivanov paiva...@gmail.com wrote:
I don't understand
I can approximately calculate, how big the new database will grow. Is
there a way to tell SQLite to reserve an inital space or numer of pages
instead of letting the database file grow again and again? I'm looking
for a way to speed up the import.
Why do you think that this kind of function
out of pages.
--Original Message--
From: Pavel Ivanov
Sender: sqlite-users-boun...@sqlite.org
To: General Discussion of SQLite Database
ReplyTo: General Discussion of SQLite Database
Subject: Re: [sqlite] Reserve database pages
Sent: Aug 12, 2010 06:20
I can approximately calculate
The same with STL vectors: initializing it with a size is faster than
growing it element by element.
That's pretty bad comparison. Initializing of vector with size is
faster because it doesn't have to copy all elements later when it
reallocates its memory. File system doesn't work that way, it
Also, I see in the documentation that when shared-cache mode is enabled,
SQLite uses table-level locking (instead of the default file-locking).
Taken all together, it suggests that you can get table-level locking
*and* write-ahead logging *and* atomic multi-table commits -- all within
a
Is there any way to have them committed by
default? Basically I *only* want the transaction rolled back in case of an
explicit rollback statement, not due to program crash/power failure, etc. Does
anyone know of a way of doing this?
You can avoid transaction begin/commit statements, so that
I'm not sure what do you want to return for the case like this:
s1r1 r2 t1
s1r1 r2 t2
s1r1 r3 t2
But for your initial request the following query will be good:
select t1.*
from table_name t1,
(select s, count(*) cnt
I'd still like
to know what I can pass to the jdbc driver to make it know I don't
expect a recordset. I haven't found any information on this. Since
According to documentation on Ant's sql task you don't have to show it
explicitly whether you expect recordset to be returned or not. So
-
From: sqlite-users-boun...@sqlite.org
[mailto:sqlite-users-boun...@sqlite.org] On Behalf Of Pavel Ivanov
Sent: Monday, July 26, 2010 12:00 PM
To: General Discussion of SQLite Database
Subject: Re: [sqlite] using sqlitejdbc-v056 with ant build file
I'd still like
to know what I can pass
is?
Kyle Kimberley
Software Engineer
919-474-6041
-Original Message-
From: sqlite-users-boun...@sqlite.org
[mailto:sqlite-users-boun...@sqlite.org] On Behalf Of Pavel Ivanov
Sent: Monday, July 26, 2010 12:38 PM
To: General Discussion of SQLite Database
Subject: Re: [sqlite] using
Is there a way?
a) Temporary table
b) Do it in your application instead of SQL - that's pretty easy.
Pavel
On Fri, Jul 23, 2010 at 5:17 AM, westmeadboy m...@carter.name wrote:
I have a complex query which returns multiple rows of a single TEXT column.
I want to filter this so that only
If the following can be considered as one step then do it like this:
BEGIN;
UPDATE LSOpenSubProjects
SET price = (SELECT sum(price) FROM table1 WHERE subProjID = 24),
udate = now
WHERE subProjID = 24;
UPDATE LSOpenProjects
SET price = (SELECT sum(price) FROM
Is there a working (with C++) sqlite3.h equivalent available
somewhere, or do I need to hack on it?
A lot of people on this list including me use sqlite3.h in their C++
applications and don't see any problems compiling that as is. So you
should look at how you use that header and/or how you
BTW, I found that the huge number of data race warnings can easily be
removed. The found races are benign--it just assign same static mutex id
whenever pthreadMutexAlloc() is called. by not assigning the mutex id once
it is initialized -- as in MAKE_DRD_HAPPY --, most of race warnings are
Are there reasons not to implement optimization in the first case? Except
for this is not most requested one :)
I guess because this case is highly specific and it's behavior should
depend on particular constants used. Put there for example Id 54 =
1000 and now we should make optimizer guess
If your end user controls where to put the database file then after
receiving error Unable to open database you should tell him to
change permissions on that file to be accessible to everybody. Don't
forget to tell him to change permissions on the directory where
database resides too.
Pavel
On
I'm stuck with an environment with a 2GB file size limit.
What the exact problem do you see and how do you compile SQLite? All
modern compilers have macros _LARGEFILE_SOURCE or _FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64
defined by default and with that SQLite works perfectly with any files
with more than 2GB in size.
Looks like the answer to your question is negative:
http://www.sqlite.org/draft/pragma.html#pragma_foreign_keys
http://www.sqlite.org/draft/pragma.html#pragma_recursive_triggers
Pavel
On Sat, Jul 17, 2010 at 7:27 PM, Ben Danper seb...@live.com wrote:
As of 3.6.23.1 the pragmas foreign_keys
I don't think so. Just like the older SQLite journal system, it's important
that the WAL files survive through a crash.
I believe WAL file is not a problem here (despite some confusing macro
name that Matthew proposed). The problem is SHM file which don't have
to survive - SQLite rebuilds it
After these 500 i take a few seconds to read more data so sqlite should
have time to do any housekeeping it might need.
SQLite is not a Database Server. It has no background threads. So it
can't do any housekeeping until you call some sqlite3_* function.
Pavel
On Tue, Jul 13, 2010 at 12:33
If it is possible, how would I define a prepared statement so that I can
just bind the (10 byte) value into it?
Is it possible to pre-process your 10 bytes and insert e.g. symbol '\'
before any '\', '_' and '%' symbol? After that you can query
SELECT * FROM mytable WHERE myblob LIKE ? ESCAPE
(I guess it well might not on an SSD disk, but on a conventional
rotational disk, pager could read several pages ahead with one seek -
but does it?)
You mean that pager should read several pages at once even if it
doesn't need them right now but it estimates that it will need them in
near
one thread is preparing an INSERT statement (It returns SQLITE_OK),
then it is executed using sqlite3_step. sqlite3_step returns an
SQLITE_BUSY! Is there any possibility for this?
Sure. Preparing INSERT statement doesn't acquire any write locks on
the database. It's executing the INSERT
You men to handle the BUSY by waiting for some time and trying to execute
sqlite3_step?
You can call sqlite3_busy_timeout() with appropriate value after
opening a connection and SQLite will do this waiting for you. Just
remember that explicit transaction that began as read-only and then
So it means we can have mor than one valid db handle?
Yes.
Pavel
On Wed, Jul 7, 2010 at 9:29 AM, Lloyd ll...@cdactvm.in wrote:
So it means we can have mor than one valid db handle?
Thanks,
Lloyd
- Original Message -
From: Pavel Ivanov paiva...@gmail.com
To: General Discussion
The build warning is my main concern:
warning BK4504 : file contains too many references; ignoring further
references from this source
Looks like this warning can be safely ignored and internet even has
quite a few suggestions on its suppression. Here's what I found:
Is there a command
similar to 'use database' (mysql) in sqlite3 so that I can make a
particular database as default? (I don't find such command, but please
let me know in case if I miss anything.)
Yes. It is sqlite3_open() in C API. And if you use command line
utility then you should pass the
The receiving field is defined as CHAR; [snip]
SQLite has no such type. Define the fields as TEXT instead:
Simon, please don't confuse poor users. SQLite will work perfectly and
indistinguishably well with both CHAR and TEXT. Please read the link
you gave more carefully (hint: bullet number 2
I found out that including the header file alone is not enough. I need to
link the sqlite lib to my project. But how can can I get the lib?
Just include sqlite3.c file into your project as a source and that's
it, VC++ will take care of compiling it and linking it into your
binary.
Pavel
On
intended
functionality. With that in mind CHAR and TEXT are both right, as
well as VARCHAR or VARCHAR(256). Everyone can use what he is used to.
Pavel
On Tue, Jul 6, 2010 at 10:09 PM, P Kishor punk.k...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Jul 6, 2010 at 8:45 PM, Pavel Ivanov paiva...@gmail.com wrote
If you want the equality operator to be case-insensitive then your
column in the table should be declared collate nocase. And it
doesn't matter whether you have index or not for this to work
(execution speed can differ though). But if you don't want that but
want like operator (which is
, Pavel Ivanov paiva...@gmail.com wrote:
If you want the equality operator to be case-insensitive then your
column in the table should be declared collate nocase. And it
doesn't matter whether you have index or not for this to work
(execution speed can differ though). But if you don't want
But this doesn't show anything that count more than n times. I want
the type_id shows up more than n times in the database only appear n
times in the result of the query.
That's some exotic requirements you've got there. Is it possible to
elaborate them? Probably your best solution is not in
I tried the following two commands. Neither of them work. Would
you please let me know what is the command to insert a record with the
default value?
Try this:
insert into test default values;
Pavel
On Fri, Jul 2, 2010 at 9:40 PM, Peng Yu pengyu...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
create table test
No, I am not asking SQLite to emulate an error in Adobe's code. Rather I
am suggesting this: if SQLite is going to distinguish in any way between INT
and INTEGER on primary key definitions, the CREATE TABLE X as SELECT...
syntax ought not to produce a table with an INT primary key if the
1, 2010 at 9:39 AM, Simon Slavin slav...@bigfraud.org wrote:
On 1 Jul 2010, at 2:21pm, Pavel Ivanov wrote:
CREATE TABLE X as SELECT...
syntax ought not to produce a table with an INT primary key if the prototype
had INTEGER.
The problem is not with primary keys, it's with the types
at 10:44 AM, Simon Slavin slav...@bigfraud.org wrote:
On 1 Jul 2010, at 2:49pm, Pavel Ivanov wrote:
This is obviously wrong. The SELECT command from TABLE t could never have
returned any INT values (because SQLite has no INT datatype). So why was
TABLE t_copy created with an INT column
This type of questions should go to sqlite-us...@sqlite.org.
Forwarding you there.
Pavel
On Thu, Jul 1, 2010 at 6:52 PM, c...@comcast.net wrote:
I am pretty new to Android but not new to programming.
I want to do something that I thought was fairly simple, but can't seem to
find any
want so far
then you were just lucky. Try to change your query like this:
SELECT id, name, id2, name2, max(year) y
GROUP BY id, name2
ORDER BY name2, y DESC
LIMIT 0, 15
Pavel
On Wed, Jun 30, 2010 at 6:21 AM, J. Rios jriosli...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Jun 30, 2010 at 2:40 AM, Pavel Ivanov paiva
SELECT id, name, id2, name2 GROUP BY id ORDER BY name2, year DESC LIMIT 0,
15
How can I make it faster?
First of all your query should return nonsense in any field except id.
I bet it will also return different results (for the same ids)
depending on what LIMIT clause you add or don't add it
...which actually surprises me, since I was under the impression
CREATE TABLE ... AS SELECT always produced NONE affinities. Is this
a semi-recent (last year) change?
It looks like the only recent change was a year ago:
http://www.sqlite.org/changes.html#version_3_6_15.
But according to
I think
SQLite implementations should probably adhere to a core spec but I recognize
this as my bias, not dogma.
Probably this is my personal opinion but why should SQLite comply with
specification of Pick Multi-dimensional databases if it never claimed
to be multi-dimensional? SQLite is a
, Pavel Ivanov paiva...@gmail.com wrote:
I think
SQLite implementations should probably adhere to a core spec but I
recognize
this as my bias, not dogma.
Probably this is my personal opinion but why should SQLite comply with
specification of Pick Multi-dimensional databases if it never
the difference and the SORT
is getting slow as its not using the index. I have read that sqlite only
uses one Index by query.
There must be a solution but I dont get it.
Thanks in advance
On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 9:49 AM, Pavel Ivanov paiva...@gmail.com wrote:
SELECT id, name, id2, name2
the primary key column [id] is defined as INTEGER PRMARY KEY; so defined,
SQLite will treat this column as an alias for the ROWID. There is no
guarantee that ROWID will remain constant over time: its job is very simple:
to be unique. There is no be constant clause in its contract, so to
Tim,
there are no NULLS in my example and I don't believe in a frontend-problem (I
wouldn't interpret the SQL.LOG this way).
If you don't believe that it's your frontend problem then go ahead and
reproduce it in sqlite3 command line utility. If you were able to
reproduce it there then it would be
you to have any UNIQUE constraint
then, as Darren said, you better consider using some other driver, not
a workaround for this one. I believe there are several ODBC drivers
for SQLite out there.
Pavel
On Mon, Jun 28, 2010 at 11:00 AM, Oliver Peters oliver@web.de wrote:
Pavel Ivanov paiva
this ODBC driver (probably you use it through some wrapper or
something else is standing in the way). I think you should reduce your
case to some few calls to ODBC and post it here if it still doesn't
work.
Pavel
On Mon, Jun 28, 2010 at 11:24 AM, Oliver Peters oliver@web.de wrote:
Pavel Ivanov
using the same frontend is reading this and
will direct you where you should file a bug...
Pavel
On Mon, Jun 28, 2010 at 12:23 PM, Oliver Peters oliver@web.de wrote:
Pavel Ivanov paiva...@... writes:
[...]
And as no one experienced problems like yours before then I guess we
can switch
is to add another
column to the table and to make it an alternate unique key. This value
carries for him the specific meaning position in a string in exchange
protocol between 2 systems.
Regards
Tim Romano
Swarthmore PA
On Mon, Jun 28, 2010 at 10:23 AM, Pavel Ivanov paiva...@gmail.com wrote
update TABLE2 set z = @z
where rowid in (
select t2.rowid
from TABLE1_2 t12, TABLE2 t2
where t12.a = @a
and t12.b = @b
and t2.x = t12.x
and t2.y = t12.y
)
Pavel
On Fri, Jun 25, 2010 at 9:04 AM, Matthew Jones matthew.jo...@hp.com wrote:
I've seen various posts about who to get around the lack
Erik, I didn't quite understand what you wanted to say. Neither about
RSQLite and new field (it seems that you use the same field in both
tables), nor about having data in the same table. Could you please
elaborate?
Pavel
On Thu, Jun 24, 2010 at 11:37 AM, Erik Wright eswri...@wisc.edu wrote:
I was asking whether it is possible to use Shebang with sqlite script.
If it is possible, would you please show me how to modify the
following script to do so?
If you don't mind one error message then you can do it like this:
cat test.sql
#!/usr/bin/sqlite3 -init
;
create table tbl1(one
The question following your suggestion is how do i maintain transaction
start and stop times? I have no control of knowing when a transaction
starts and ends and i said earlier, i cannot use transaction hooks.
And you didn't answer my question: how will you put this transaction
identifier into
with fatal error
}
}
Pavel
On Tue, Jun 22, 2010 at 6:18 PM, Sam Carleton
scarle...@miltonstreet.com wrote:
On Tue, Jun 22, 2010 at 10:13 AM, Pavel Ivanov paiva...@gmail.com wrote:
No, I did not. I am not storing any blobs right now, but... Is the busy
handler going to kick
Just an idea - not checked (I never use Out-of-Office auto-replies),
but could work: if your email client is MS Outlook then probably it
would be better to not use Out-of-Office Assistant, but setup new rule
instead. Make this rule for every message except for those that sent
to
501 - 600 of 1164 matches
Mail list logo
