Viadana, Italy - SQLabs has announced SQLiteManager 3.5, the most powerful
sqlite database manager tool for MacOS X and Windows. SQLiteManager is a
powerful GUI database manager for sqlite databases. It combines an incredible
easy to use interface with blazing speed and advanced features.
In my case, the DB is created by the older version of application and
now the new version of application is installed and End user has option
to see old data with selecting old version of DB so its completely on
end user wish to choose the location for DB. And also new tables in DB
are created to
> Is there a working (with C++) sqlite3.h equivalent available
> somewhere, or do I need to hack on it?
A lot of people on this list including me use sqlite3.h in their C++
applications and don't see any problems compiling that as is. So you
should look at how you use that header and/or how you
--
追求自由,崇尚简单~
-- Original --
From: "Jay A. Kreibich";
Date: 2010年7月7日(星期三) 下午4:41
To: "General Discussion of SQLite Database";
Subject: Re: [sqlite] Getting declared datatype of a column in C
Yes, retry on SQLITE_SCHEMA solve the problem. Should the FAQ be updated?
BTW, I found that the huge number of data race warnings can easily be
removed. The found races are benign--it just assign same static mutex id
whenever pthreadMutexAlloc() is called. by not assigning the mutex id once
it is
> BTW, I found that the huge number of data race warnings can easily be
> removed. The found races are benign--it just assign same static mutex id
> whenever pthreadMutexAlloc() is called. by not assigning the mutex id once
> it is initialized -- as in MAKE_DRD_HAPPY --, most of race warnings are
I have some code which uses the sqlite3_blob_write() function, but I
observe some odd behaviour.
When I pass it a QVector (Qt vector class - similar to std::vector,
contiguous memory) of a class C (for example) when the vector is of
significant size (over 200 entries), towards the end of the
On Tuesday, July 20, 2010 12:37 PM, Robert McVicar wrote:
>I have some code which uses the sqlite3_blob_write() function, but I
> observe some odd behaviour.
> When I pass it a QVector (Qt vector class - similar to std::vector,
> contiguous memory) of a class C (for example) when the vector is
Hi,
as long as I see currently bitwise right does not use index
CREATE TABLE [TestTable] ([Id] INTEGER PRIMARY KEY AUTOINCREMENT);
EXPLAIN QUERY PLAN SELECT * FROM TestTable WHERE Id >> 12 = 1000;
: TABLE TestTable
Sure I can replace it with the following query
EXPLAIN QUERY PLAN SELECT * FROM
> Are there reasons not to implement optimization in the first case? Except
> for this is not most requested one :)
I guess because this case is highly specific and it's behavior should
depend on particular constants used. Put there for example Id >> 54 =
1000 and now we should make optimizer
SQLite Expert (which I use extensively in the Pro version) enforces
> displaying types as declared. So if you declare your column as INTEGER
> (or INT, ...) then it will display integers regardless of the actual
> individual data type using common conversions. This is a side effect
> of the
On Tue, Jul 20, 2010 at 5:14 PM, Pavel Ivanov wrote:
> > Are there reasons not to implement optimization in the first case? Except
> > for this is not most requested one :)
>
> I guess because this case is highly specific and it's behavior should
> depend on particular
What is the rationale about placing complex conditions in the ON part
of an inner join rather than in an WHERE clause?
I understand that the ON clause will limit the temporary table
processed by a subsequent WHERE clause, while a larger table will be
filtered by the WHERE part if no selective
Jean-Christophe Deschamps wrote:
> What is the rationale about placing complex conditions in the ON part
> of an inner join rather than in an WHERE clause?
Except for outer joins, the difference is purely stylistic. They are
functionally equivalent. In fact, SQLite internally
On Tue, Jul 20, 2010 at 9:43 AM, Jean-Christophe Deschamps
wrote:
> What is the rationale about placing complex conditions in the ON part
> of an inner join rather than in an WHERE clause?
My sense is that it is not so much about "complexity" but more about
the logic of the
Hi all,
I was running a system using an old sqlite3.dll (version 3.0.8, I believe).
Updating to the latest version (3.6.23) causes my program to run
incredibly slowly.
As an example, selecting approximately 30,000 records was taking 10
seconds with the old dll, and with the updated version
> > What is the rationale about placing complex conditions in the ON part
> > of an inner join rather than in an WHERE clause?
>
>Except for outer joins, the difference is purely stylistic. They are
>functionally equivalent. In fact, SQLite internally rewrites the
>former to the latter, before
how to get the number of rows in a a table? what is the function to get that?
Please add a sample code to achive that.
thanks
dmsmsm
--
View this message in context:
http://old.nabble.com/how-to-get-the-number-of-rows-in-a-a-table--tp29216126p29216126.html
Sent from the SQLite mailing list
On Tue, Jul 20, 2010 at 11:41 AM, dmsmsm wrote:
>
> how to get the number of rows in a a table? what is the function to get that?
> Please add a sample code to achive that.
SELECT Count(*) FROM table;
___
sqlite-users mailing
Select count(*) from table
--Original Message--
From: dmsmsm
Sender: sqlite-users-boun...@sqlite.org
To: sqlite-users@sqlite.org
ReplyTo: General Discussion of SQLite Database
Subject: [sqlite] how to get the number of rows in a a table?
Sent: Jul 20, 2010 09:41
how to get the number
On Tue, Jul 20, 2010 at 7:38 PM, Ed Hawke <
edward.ha...@hawkeyeinnovations.co.uk> wrote:
> I was running a system using an old sqlite3.dll (version 3.0.8, I believe).
>
> Updating to the latest version (3.6.23) causes my program to run
> incredibly slowly.
>
>
Can you provide more details about
On Tue, Jul 20, 2010 at 04:43:26PM +0400, Max Vlasov scratched on the wall:
> Hi,
> as long as I see currently bitwise right does not use index
Doing this requires recognizing when an inverse expression exists,
and then computing it. It is extremely difficult in the general
case. If you
> In the case of SQLite, it is also very unlikely to save space. In
> fact, because of the way integer values are stored, it is very
> likely to use more space.
>
Jay, In most cases yes, but there are ones with several integers that should
be used together in ordering, the space is wasted
Hi,
Iam new to sqlite3. I want to get the number of rows in a table. I am using
sqlite_exec(), but not sure, this is the correct function to get the number
of rows.
Please help me
my code is
NSString *rowcount = [NSString stringWithFormat:@"SELECT COUNT(*) FROM
DB;"];
char *err;
if
If your end user controls where to put the database file then after
receiving error "Unable to open database" you should tell him to
change permissions on that file to be accessible to everybody. Don't
forget to tell him to change permissions on the directory where
database resides too.
Pavel
[[
Get your papers in.
The deadline for abstracts and proposals is
less than two weeks away.
]]
17th Annual Tcl/Tk Conference (Tcl'2010)
http://www.tcl.tk/community/tcl2010/
October 11 - 15, 2010
Hilton Suites/Conference Center
Chicago/Oakbrook Terrace, Illinois, USA
Important
Hi,
We're experiencing strange database corruptions using SQLite database (we
are using it for over three years). We are reporting this now because one of
databases got corrupted on less sensitive data which we can give you
for analysis and because we wanted to reject all other possibilities of
On 20 Jul 2010, at 7:42pm, dmsmsm wrote:
> Iam new to sqlite3. I want to get the number of rows in a table. I am using
> sqlite_exec(), but not sure, this is the correct function to get the number
> of rows.
> Please help me
> my code is
>
> NSString *rowcount = [NSString
On Tue, Jul 20, 2010 at 10:41:04PM +0100, Simon Slavin scratched on the wall:
>
> On 20 Jul 2010, at 7:42pm, dmsmsm wrote:
> > if (sqlite3_exec(db, [rowcount UTF8String], NULL, NULL, ) != SQLITE_OK)
> Second, I see no reason why your code wouldn't work. Did you try it ?
> What happened ?
On Mon, Jul 19, 2010 at 9:46 PM, Simon Slavin wrote:
>
> On 20 Jul 2010, at 2:01am, Sam Carleton wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Jul 19, 2010 at 3:51 PM, Simon Slavin
> wrote:
> >
> >> You know, I think that the most efficient way to do what you want will
> >>
On 21 Jul 2010, at 12:42am, Sam Carleton wrote:
> There are two equally
> important requires, one is to connect to the second "EventDB", the other is
> that the system admin can change the EventDB at any time.
You mean change the contents of that file, or change which file is nominated as
the
In my case, the DB is created by the older version of application and
now the new version of application is installed and End user has option
to see old data with selecting old version of DB so its completely on
end user wish to choose the location for DB. And also new tables in DB
are created
32 matches
Mail list logo