-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 22/03/12 22:57, Steinar Midtskogen wrote:
> I'm planning to allow users to make database queries through a web
> page. I'm thinking of letting the user provide the string that goes
> between SELECT and FROM using the sqlite3 command tool, but
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I also forgot to mention doing all that stuff on a second connection.
Open that one read-only (SQLITE_OPEN_READONLY).
You can also double check a statement makes no changes:
http://www.sqlite.org/c3ref/stmt_readonly.htmla
Roger
-BEGIN PGP
I have a virtual table implementation, that implements the
xBestIndex/xFilter funktions and I found the following problem:
This query
SELECT * FROM vf WHERE field LIKE "F%";
will result in a call to xBestIndex with the following constraint
field >= ... AND field < ...
when SQLITE calls
When building using the SQLite amalgamation, I noticed Windows.h being included
without #define WIN32_LEAN_AND_MEAN. This includes a lot of extraneous
"cruft". Any reason not to trim down the windows build this way?
___
sqlite-users mailing list
Hello Jeff,
Isn't that just a build time thing? Include fewer includes during the
compile? I just don't build sqlite often enough to seem to think this
matters. Pretty sure this has no impact on the ultimate size of the
code generated.
Friday, March 23, 2012, 7:51:36 AM, you wrote:
JR>
Ruby on Rails -- ActiveRecord. ActiveRecord prevents sql injections, I
think. Using ERB in the html would give you that kind of functionality.
Correct?
dvn
On Fri, Mar 23, 2012 at 2:49 AM, Roger Binns wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> I also
Hello,
Not sure if this question belongs here, let me know if it doesn't. It
can also be answered here
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/9808284/why-does-manually-implementing-a-hash-tag-give-a-performance-boost-to-my-queries
and I'll cross post relevant info to stackoverflow if I receive it.
I
Hi
I'm new to SQLite, coming from an Access/VB background. Having moved over to
Linux I'm now developing an application using Gambas. One of the requirements
is to store a scanned document (PDF) in a record as a blob, along with its
metadata. I've no problem selecting the document, but I'm
On 23 Mar 2012, at 4:29pm, Nigel Verity wrote:
> I'm new to SQLite, coming from an Access/VB background. Having moved over to
> Linux I'm now developing an application using Gambas. One of the requirements
> is to store a scanned document (PDF) in a record as a blob,
Nigel Verity wrote:
> I'm new to SQLite, coming from an Access/VB background. Having moved over to
> Linux I'm now developing an application using
> Gambas. One of the requirements is to store a scanned document (PDF) in a
> record as a blob, along with its metadata.
I got a error message "could not prepare statement (1 no such table:
LivroDaBiblia) (Code 5)"
trying the following code on executeSQL SELECT..
The message was captured at console.log of CHROME
When I use command line shell it works fine. The table is OK with 66 lines.
Anyone can help me??
On Fri, Mar 23, 2012 at 11:26 AM, Kristof Van Landschoot
wrote:
> Not sure if this question belongs here, let me know if it doesn't. It
> can also be answered here
>
On 23 Mar 2012, at 5:46pm, WaltĂȘnio de Bessa Mendes
wrote:
> I got a error message "could not prepare statement (1 no such table:
> LivroDaBiblia) (Code 5)"
Make sure you're opening the correct database file. Try specifying the full
path to the file.
Simon.
You may want to add "FailIfMissing=true" to your connection string. It always
surprises me when I successfully connect to a database and then an attempt to
read from a table that I know durn well is there fails.
RobR
-Original Message-
From: sqlite-users-boun...@sqlite.org
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 23/03/12 06:33, Don V Nielsen wrote:
> Ruby on Rails -- ActiveRecord. ActiveRecord prevents sql injections,
> I think. Using ERB in the html would give you that kind of
> functionality. Correct?
I don't see the relevance of your comment. The
On March 23, Jeff Robbins wrote:
When building using the SQLite amalgamation, I noticed Windows.h being included without
#define WIN32_LEAN_AND_MEAN. This includes a lot of extraneous "cruft". Any
reason not to trim down the windows build this way?
There is no real reason not to do that.
Kristof Van Landschoot wrote:
> Why doesn't sqlite implement a hash tag on strings itself when there is an
> index?
Because a hash would only help with conditions of the form "textField = ?",
while the kind of b-tree index that SQLite utilizes also works for "textField >
While #define WINDOWS_LEAN_AND_MEAN is only a compile-time setting, it trims
down extraneous #defines that Windows.h creates that can interfere with
reasonable uses of SQLite, such as the excellent APSW extension for Python:
The problem I happened upon was trying to build a Python extension
18 matches
Mail list logo