Hi,
I'm looking for a way to install System.Data.SQLite unattended, as part of
the installation procedure of my product.
How can this be achieved?
Regards,
Matthijs ter Woord
___
sqlite-users mailing list
sqlite-users@sqlite.org
Matthijs ter Woord wrote:
>
> I'm looking for a way to install System.Data.SQLite unattended, as part of
> the installation procedure of my product.
> How can this be achieved?
>
Normally, there is nothing that requires installation on an end-user
machine.
Simply deploy the System.Data.SQLite
Hi,
I use two databases in a application (.exe):
sqlite3_open16 (“db1.db”, db_1); // open first
sqlite3_open16 (“db2.db”, db_2); // open second
when I INSERT some data into db_1, data is actually inserted into db_2.
Is this my bug or Sqlite’s bug?
Thank you.
BR,
Simon
On 5/24/2013 8:10 AM, Simon Wei wrote:
I use two databases in a application (.exe):
sqlite3_open16 (“db1.db”, db_1); // open first
sqlite3_open16 (“db2.db”, db_2); // open second
when I INSERT some data into db_1, data is actually inserted into db_2.
Is this my bug or Sqlite’s bug?
I'm
To get answers in a similar situation I found useful the EXPLAIN QUERY
PLAN command.
On Fri, May 24, 2013 at 3:56 PM, kyan wrote:
> On Fri, May 24, 2013 at 4:46 PM, Marc L. Allen
> wrote:
>
>> It's exhaustive in that it absolutely verifies if
Hi Vance,
...yes it seems reasonable to expect the same resulting order if your
subsequent (temp creating) query is identical to that which was run
previously. However I can understand, from a theoretical and experience
point of view, why you might feel uneasy about relying on a rowid as the
6 matches
Mail list logo