On Sat, Mar 19, 2016 at 11:56 PM, Roger Binns wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> My rule of thumb is to always quote (using square brackets) when the
> query is generated by code, and only quote where reasonable when the
> query is written by a human.
>
Seems like using
Hello,
On 2016-03-21 08:57, Dominique Devienne wrote:
> Seems like using square-brackets instead of double-quotes is non-standard:
> https://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/SQL_Dialects_Reference/Data_structure_definition/Delimited_identifiers
Explicitly documented by SQLite:
hi, I am new to the list so will demonstrate ignorance right of the bat.
have compiled 3.12 from source under Ubuntu 14.04 x86 and all good. recursion
works as advertised.
for something like sqliteman or sqlitemanager (i feel the shame) and maybe
other packages they don't seem 3.12 aware even
>> On 3/19/16, James K. Lowden wrote:
>> ... If the correctness of the code is
>> subject to change by the compiler's interpretation of the language, how
>> is the programmer to prevent it?
> On Sat, 19 Mar 2016 15:50:43 -0400 Richard Hipp wrote:
> ... But subsequent revisions of the
>
On Mon, Mar 21, 2016 at 11:01 AM, Cezary H. Noweta
wrote:
> On 2016-03-21 08:57, Dominique Devienne wrote:
>
>> Seems like using square-brackets instead of double-quotes is non-standard:
>>
>> https://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/SQL_Dialects_Reference/Data_structure_definition/Delimited_identifiers
>>
Sorry for the late reply. That output (--1 etc.) was me manually
"formatting" the results.
I came across this issue using SQLiteStudio v3.0.7 on Windows. I just
create a new DB and run that script: it outputs two rows, with one column
each, with the values 1 and 2 respectively, instead of an
AFAIK, SQLite comes from the grass roots of PostgreSQL. Whatever
'standards' it adheres to, SQLite goes by. As a fact, I don't know what
those standards are, and I don't care what they are. The documentation on
SQLite.org says "This is how you use it", so that's how I'll use it.
Besides,
On 20 Mar 2016, at 10:35pm, jeremydcn wrote:
> for something like sqliteman or sqlitemanager (i feel the shame) and maybe
> other packages they don't seem 3.12 aware even though I have put a symlink
> named sqlite3 pointing to sqlite3.12 in /usr/bin and there are no other
> sqlite3 on the
Hello list,
we are using System.Data.SQLite 1.0.80.0 in our product.
Does this version support windows 10?
Thx,
Hinrich
Hinrich Aue
Sr. Software Engineer
Kofax Development GmbH
Wentzinger Strasse 19
79106 Freiburg
Germany
Tel: +49 761 452 69 57234
Fax: +49 761 452 69 58734
Hinrich.Aue at
Hinrich Aue wrote:
>
> we are using System.Data.SQLite 1.0.80.0 in our product.
> Does this version support windows 10?
>
First of all, version 1.0.80.0 is almost 4 years old now and MANY
improvements have been made since then, including bug fixes. The
current release is 1.0.99.0.
If
On Mon, Mar 21, 2016 at 12:18 PM, Stephen Chrzanowski
wrote:
> AFAIK, SQLite comes from the grass roots of PostgreSQL. Whatever
> 'standards' it adheres to, SQLite goes by. As a fact, I don't know what
> those standards are, and I don't care what they are. The documentation on
> SQLite.org
Dear sirs>
I have a button previously focused. When the action was completed and the
promt was sended to other position in the MainMenu, the button remain
indicating the focus. Please, I want to know how to unfocus the button.
Thanks in advance,
yours
Ing. H?ctor F. Fiandor Rosario
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 21/03/16 03:32, Dominique Devienne wrote:
> SQLite tries to be compatible with non-standard extensions from
> various popular RDBMS', but when a standard alternative exists, it
> should be preferred IMHO. --DD
That depends on the code and project.
Hello,
https://www.sqlite.org/fts3.html#tokenizer page says that unicode61
tokenizer implements _full_ case folding (it doesn't emphasize the word,
but it's there). ftp://unicode.org/Public/6.1.0/ucd/CaseFolding.txt has
the following rules:
-- cut --
...
00DF; F; 0073 0073; # LATIN SMALL LETTER
On 3/21/16, Tomash Brechko wrote:
> Hello,
>
> https://www.sqlite.org/fts3.html#tokenizer page says that unicode61
> tokenizer implements _full_ case folding (it doesn't emphasize the word,
> but it's there).
That is a documentation error. It has now been fixed. Thanks.
Probably the error
On Mar 21, 2016, at 3:17 AM, Klaas Van B. wrote:
>
>>> On 3/19/16, James K. Lowden wrote:
>
>>> ... If the correctness of the code is
>>> subject to change by the compiler's interpretation of the language, how
>>> is the programmer to prevent it?
>
>> On Sat, 19 Mar 2016 15:50:43 -0400
On Mar 21, 2016, at 1:48 PM, Scott Perry wrote:
>
> On Mar 21, 2016, at 3:17 AM, Klaas Van B. wrote:
>>
On 3/19/16, James K. Lowden wrote:
>>
... If the correctness of the code is
subject to change by the compiler's interpretation of the language, how
is the programmer to
On 2016-03-21 20:43, Tomash Brechko wrote:
> Hello,
>
> https://www.sqlite.org/fts3.html#tokenizer page says that unicode61
> tokenizer implements _full_ case folding (it doesn't emphasize the word,
> but it's there). ftp://unicode.org/Public/6.1.0/ucd/CaseFolding.txt has
> the following rules:
On Mar 21, 2016 2:48 PM, "Scott Perry" wrote:
>
> On Mar 21, 2016, at 3:17 AM, Klaas Van B. wrote:
> >
> >>> On 3/19/16, James K. Lowden wrote:
> >
> >>> ... If the correctness of the code is
> >>> subject to change by the compiler's interpretation of the language,
how
> >>> is the programmer
On Mon, 21 Mar 2016 13:48:06 -0700
Scott Perry wrote:
> Compilers allow you to choose your standard; --std=c11 means
> something very specific (and unchanging)
They do. And that covers what the standard covers. The standard also
has limits. It includes constructs that are syntactically
On Mon, 21 Mar 2016 11:32:28 +0100
Dominique Devienne wrote:
> > Explicitly documented by SQLite:
> >
>
> And? That's still non-SQL standard.
>
> SQLite tries to be compatible with non-standard extensions from
> various popular RDBMS', but when a standard alternative exists, it
> should be
So far I just see analysis tools fail for the same sorts of valid code...
this is a bit of C# but the same idea causes the same warnings and
there's nothign tecniclally wrong with this.
class test
{
struct large_struct { public int x; }
bool arbitrary_true_false = true;
void method()
you are missing
using System;
Scott Doctor
scott at scottdoctor.com
--
On 3/21/2016 5:21 PM, J Decker wrote:
> So far I just see analysis tools fail for the same sorts of valid code...
>
> this is a bit of C# but the same idea causes the same warnings and
> there's
On Mon, Mar 21, 2016 at 8:40 PM, Scott Doctor wrote:
> you are missing
>
> using System;
whatever. It still fails because it says the variable is
uninitilalized. THe only thing that doesn't is actually running it.
That same pattern not matter what the language triggers warning/error checkers
24 matches
Mail list logo
