Hi,
This vulnerability has been addressed in SQLite 3.26.0. When could we expect
new version (official) of System.Data.SQLite which uses 3.26.0?
---
Vladimir
-Original Message-
From: sqlite-users [mailto:sqlite-users-boun...@mailinglists.sqlite.org] On
Behalf Of Keith Medcalf
YES! Thank you!
Many thanks for the ".eqp full" tip also, that really explains a lot
(though I don't really understand any of it yet).
Have a great day!
Gerlando
On Mon, Jan 28, 2019 at 6:50 AM Keith Medcalf wrote:
>
> Do you perhaps want this:
>
> select source1,
>source2,
>(
On 1/28/19, mzz...@libero.it wrote:
> Dear,
>
> I developed an application that need to create 1 table with thousand of rows
> every time when a certain event occours.
>
> This works in a good way, but when the number of the tables become huge
> (about 15000/2 tables) the first DataBase
Dear,
I developed an application that need to create 1 table with thousand of rows
every time when a certain event occours.
This works in a good way, but when the number of the tables become huge (about
15000/2 tables) the first DataBase reading query, after Database open, is
very slow
On 2019/01/28 6:17 PM, mzz...@libero.it wrote:
I developed an application that need to create 1 table with thousand of rows
every time when a certain event occours.
This works in a good way, but when the number of the tables become huge (about
15000/2 tables) the first DataBase reading
On 28 Jan 2019, at 4:17pm, mzz...@libero.it wrote:
> when the number of the tables become huge (about 15000/2 tables) the
> first DataBase reading query, after Database open, is very slow (about 4sec.)
> while next reading operations are faster.
>
> How can I speed up?
Put all the data in
Why do you need to create a new table each time? Its easier to create a
relational database. This means create one main table that might (for
example) have a 'tableID' field, which points to just one other table.
This means you only need two tables. Not 20,000+
Just an idea. Depends on what
Hi,
On Mon, Jan 28, 2019 at 10:17 AM wrote:
>
> Dear,
>
> I developed an application that need to create 1 table with thousand of rows
> every time when a certain event occours.
Are you coming from the FoxBase/ForPro world?
Thank you.
>
> This works in a good way, but when the number of the
When the same solution is offered in rapid intervals, it must be the
correct one then! :)
To elaborate on what Chris mentioned regarding relational database
methodology and related tables, here is why and a good description of
how to do that correctly:
When loading and using /usr/lib/libsqlite3.dylib (3.19.3) which is shipped
with MacOS 10.13.6 I noticed that the -wal and -shm files are not deleted
when closing the last connection to a database. I tested this with the
sqlite3 command line tool. It does not happen when I compile and link
SQLite
On Jan 28, 2019, at 1:26 AM, Vladimir Barbu
wrote:
>
> This vulnerability has been addressed in SQLite 3.26.0. When could we expect
> new version (official) of System.Data.SQLite which uses 3.26.0?
Are you both using FTS3 *and* letting your users execute arbitrary SQL?
Most of the time, the
> The table name should not be meaningful to your application; nothing in
> your application should conjure up a table name.
I can't get my head around this advice. Is this just for this occasion, or
for every application? What if I'm writing a customer address book? Am I
allowed a table
On Jan 28, 2019, at 9:17 AM, mzz...@libero.it wrote:
>
> I developed an application that need to create 1 table with thousand of rows
> every time when a certain event occours.
>
> This works in a good way, but when the number of the tables become huge
> (about 15000/2 tables) the first
On Jan 28, 2019, at 2:44 PM, Chris Locke wrote:
>
>> The table name should not be meaningful to your application; nothing in
>> your application should conjure up a table name.
>
> I can't get my head around this advice. Is this just for this occasion, or
> for every application? What if I'm
On 1/28/19, Carsten Müncheberg wrote:
> When loading and using /usr/lib/libsqlite3.dylib (3.19.3) which is shipped
> with MacOS 10.13.6 I noticed that the -wal and -shm files are not deleted
> when closing the last connection to a database. I tested this with the
> sqlite3 command line tool. It
On 28 Jan 2019, at 9:44pm, Chris Locke wrote:
>> The table name should not be meaningful to your application; nothing in your
>> application should conjure up a table name.
>
> I can't get my head around this advice. Is this just for this occasion, or
> for every application? What if I'm
On Mon, 28 Jan 2019 16:28:41 +
Simon Slavin wrote:
> SQL is not designed to have a variable number of tables in a
> database. All the optimization is done assuming that you will have a
> low number of tables, and rarely create or drop tables.
This.
The table name should not be meaningful
Having moved from SQLCipher to SEE some time ago, the old advice that SQLCipher
gave has stuck with me (from https://www.zetetic.net/sqlcipher/design/ in the
Database Encryption and Temporary Files section): “Provided that you taken the
important step of disabling file base temporary stores
On 1/28/19, Jim Borden wrote:
> I see. That complicates things a bit. What happens to SQLite temp files
> when they are "done being used" (if such a concept exists). Are they
> deleted or simply left there for the OS to clean up?
SQLite calls unlink() immediately after open(). So the OS
Intermediate results may be written into a temp file, if they overflow
memory. This could result in an information leak, yes. On the other
hand, if you set SQLITE_TEMP_STORE=2 so that intermediate results are
held in memory, then intermediate results may be written to swap space
when the device
I see. That complicates things a bit. What happens to SQLite temp files when
they are "done being used" (if such a concept exists). Are they deleted or
simply left there for the OS to clean up?
Jim Borden
On 2019/01/29 8:35, "sqlite-users on behalf of Richard Hipp"
wrote:
Part of what the FTS extension does is maintaining an inverted index.
Is it possible to use this inverted-index functionality without the rest of
FTS? I imagine it would involve modifications to the FTS5 code, but could those
be minor or would it require extensive hacking? Or alternatively, is
This is expected behaviour. As Richard guessed, the system libsqlite3.dylib is
built with SQLITE_ENABLE_PERSIST_WAL. For Darwin systems, the compromise of
keeping the extra 4MiB (max) file around is generally worth the reduced I/O
overhead that results from creating, resizing, and unlinking
Am Mo., 28. Jan. 2019 um 20:01 Uhr schrieb Richard Hipp :
> On 1/28/19, Carsten Müncheberg wrote:
> > When loading and using /usr/lib/libsqlite3.dylib (3.19.3) which is
> shipped
> > with MacOS 10.13.6 I noticed that the -wal and -shm files are not deleted
> > when closing the last connection to
I wish to define custom aggregate functions in Tcl, but this capability is
currently not exposed through the Tcl interface. Thus I am thinking about
how best to add it. Here's a first crack at a design proposal:
Extend the [db function] command to accept an -aggregate switch that makes
the new
Dear,
I have minor a concern with alter table .. rename to ...
Please follow this sample (3.26.0):
sqlite> create table T(A integer);
sqlite> .schema T
CREATE TABLE T(A integer);
sqlite> alter table T rename to X;
sqlite> .schema X
CREATE TABLE IF NOT EXISTS "X"(A integer);
A. Why does X needs
I use Convert.ToInt32 (or whatever else is appropriate) instead of direct
casts when reading from System.Data.SQLite... I use a very similar schema
in an SQLServer and SQLite database, and Convert seems to handle many of
the differences without requiring different code for each database engine.
27 matches
Mail list logo
