Thomas Briggs wrote:
From the looks of this warning, I would guess that you could redefine
SQLITE_STATIC like this (or some variation of this that is
legal C++) to solve
the problem:
#define SQLITE_STATIC ((extern "C" void(*)(void*)) 0)
I don't think there's any legal way to do this, is t
Chad Whitacre wrote:
I am interested in the reasoning behind SQLite's dedication to the
public domain vis-a-vis other copyright/licensing options (GPL, BSD,
etc.) Is there any documentation available on this decision?
It comes down to goals. If your goal is to give other people code to
use, t
Al Rider wrote:
Is there anyone successfully running SQLite on a FreeBSD machine? If so,
would you email me and give me some help with it.
I've never used it on anything else. The instructions assume that make
is actually GNU make, which is almost certainly not the case on a
non-Linux machine.
Liz Steel wrote:
You say that I shouldn't get a corrupt database when I pull the power,
but I am consistently getting this. I am using SQLite version 2.8.9
using the C++ interface running on Windows XP Home. Is there anything I
can do to stop this happening?
If you have an IDE hard drive that's
Andrew Piskorski wrote:
On Thu, Apr 15, 2004 at 08:33:14AM -0500, Greg Miller wrote:
support that. The FreeBSD folks tried to solve this by turning off write
caching by default. Unfortunately, this hurt performance so much they
had to turn it back on and just recommend SCSI drives for important
D. Richard Hipp wrote:
From what I am told, most IDE drives do signal the OS when the data
reaches the platter. I'm also told that the Linux fsync() call does
not return until it gets that signal. The Windows FlushFileBuffers(),
on the other hand, does not wait for the data to get to platter.
Greg Obleshchuk wrote:
I know the MS is looking at replacing the file system with the SQL engine in Longhorn so they must have solved the issue.
They're not replacing NTFS with a database. They're implementing a
database layer (WinFS) on top of NTFS. It's not entirely clear what
they're doing, b
Ulrik Petersen wrote:
IANAL, but the way I understand it, you can't link against their
libraries and still distribute your code under an Open Source license,
or distribute your binaries under a license that requires that the
software be offered at no charge. My understanding may be flawed, so
Michael Roth wrote:
Please switch off Reply-To again.
There are certainly a few drawbacks to using Reply-To, but I can't
remember the last time I was on a mailing list that didn't make use of
it. Clearly, there's a very solid consensus out there that Reply-To is
the way to go.
--
http://www.vel
Christian Smith wrote:
I found it funny, while looking through Dr Dobbs journal some time ago,
about a columnist (Al Stevens, I think!) being surprised that under UNIX,
such things as filename globbing was done by the shell, and all main()
usually gets is a list of valid filenames. Under DOS and Wi
Christian Smith wrote:
On Fri, 3 Sep 2004, Greg Miller wrote:
I guess the UNIX folks just didn't know any better way back then.
Putting globbing in the API instead of the shell is a much better
approach, but that wasn't all that obvious when UNIX first came along.
You condone the D
amead wrote:
Are you doing this at the Cygwin prompt or Window's command prompt? My
installation of Cygwin doesn't recognize DOS style paths at all:
$ ls c:\cygwin
ls: c:cygwin: No such file or directory
You used a backslash, escaping the 'c' character. Notice that the error
message refers to "
Sandy Ganz wrote:
This doesn't sound right, I have seen the problem that linux will not use
the allocated memory until it is touched, but doesn't the memory manger keep
track ultimatly of all allocations (in the kernel which as all encompassing
knowledge of allocations) which might include things t
Michael Keilhofer wrote:
Is there any way to identify what sqlite is doing that it thinks it
needs an exclusive lock?
Yes, it has a read in progress. You can't read and write at the same
time. I ran into the same problem when I started using SQLite.
--
http://www.velocityvector.com/ | http://www.
Robert L Cochran wrote:
I don't know how to explain this "excitement" myself, except through
examples that might bore you because I don't know the details of how to
write a program that takes advantage of a 64 bit cpu. The excitement is
mainly about speed, I would say. To make compiled software
Robert L Cochran wrote:
I should have indicated in my earlier post that magazines which do
side-by-side hardware testing are saying that the AMD Athlon 64 is
indeed faster than the Pentium 4; for example look in the January issue
of Maximum PC magazine. they have a followup test supplementing an
D. Richard Hipp wrote:
On Mon, 2005-01-31 at 11:31 -0600, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
99% of the world is on windows
I can't speak for the whole world, but visitors to the
SQLite website over the past two weeks break out something
like this:
Windows: 80.6%
Linux:14.9%
Mac: 4
Richard Boyd wrote:
I tried what you suggested and I always get the error message:
"SQL error: no such column: table32"
Whether the table exists or not, I always get returned value of 1 from
sqlite3_exec().
The exact command that I use is:
SELECT count(*) FROM sqlite_master WHERE name=table32 AND t
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
After 15 years of assembler programming, I am still to find a compiler that
makes debugging and optimizing as easy as assembler.
I can't remember the number of times that C has got me deep into memory
leaks.
Then give C++ a try.
If you need low level programming, C is a go
19 matches
Mail list logo
