Hi,
As per documentation opening a database with SQLITE_OPEN_NOMUTEX flag opens it
in multi-threaded mode.
http://www.sqlite.org/threadsafe.html says In this mode, SQLite can be safely
used by multiple threads provided that no single database connection is used
simultaneously in two or more
Hi,
I wanted to get an understanding of SQLite Encryption Extension. I am currently
using sqlite-3.7.2, and if I want to use SEE, would it be equally compatible.
Well, the http://www.hwaci.com/sw/sqlite/see.html page does not give much
information, i.e. do still build sqlite from public and
Hi,
We were looking at the ways we can optimize our application. Our app does a
simple sqlite3_exec and sends the callback as below. The data is just a
map
int sqlite3TableCallback(void* data, int ncols, char** values, char** headers)
{
map& table
.)
Regards,
Prakash Reddy Bande
Altair Engg. Inc,
Troy, MI
-
To unsubscribe, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
Thanks,
I will try both (ASCII and BLOB) approaches and see speed vs. storage
trade-offs. Any more ideas are welcome.
Regards,
Prakash Reddy Bande
Altair Engg. Inc,
Troy, MI
-Original Message-
From: John Stanton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2007 11:26 AM
sure it's a large number and I hope my database will not consume
all of it). Moreover, when the database no longer uses a uuid, it can be
removed from this table too, which might mean a considerable work for
application developer :-).
Regards,
Prakash Reddy Bande
Altair Engg. Inc,
Troy, MI
Prakash Reddy Bande
Altair Engg. Inc,
Troy, MI
OK,
I figured it out X should be followed by only hex characters 0-9, a-f.
Regards,
Prakash Reddy Bande
Altair Engg. Inc,
Troy, MI
-Original Message-
From: Prakash Reddy Bande [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, August 31, 2007 4:00 PM
To: sqlite-users@sqlite.org
Subject: [sqlite
are not
aggregate. But the query did give some results.
How does SQLite choose which row to return from a group?
Regards,
Prakash Reddy Bande
Altair Engg. Inc,
Troy, MI
that 3.5.1
will be as stable as 3.4.0.
The reason I am moving over is that the sources for fts are based 3.5.1.
How can I get the sources of fts based on 3.4.0 if I have to use 3.4.0?
Regards,
Prakash Reddy Bande
Altair Engg. Inc,
Troy, MI
any in memory cached data in my processes.
How do I go about achieving this?
Regards,
Prakash Reddy Bande
Altair Engg. Inc,
Troy, MI
updatelog
Doing this, I can have every connection have its own updatelog table
Prakash Reddy Bande
Altair Engg. Inc,
Troy, MI
Me too, all attempts to unsubscribe have failed. I have put a filter, but still
my .pst is becoming big.
From: sqlite-users-boun...@sqlite.org [sqlite-users-boun...@sqlite.org] On
Behalf Of Pece Cvetkoski [pcvetko...@yahoo.com]
Sent: Saturday, May 22,
Hi,
I have stumbled upon the issue as described in http://sqlite.org/faq.html#q5
(But use caution: this locking mechanism might not work correctly if the
database file is kept on an NFS filesystem.)
The question is, do we have a workaround. Our application has to store data in
user home
of SQLite Database
Subject: Re: [sqlite] Locking issue on NFS filesystem
On 14 Jun 2010, at 3:16am, Prakash Reddy Bande wrote:
> I have stumbled upon the issue as described in http://sqlite.org/faq.html#q5
> (But use caution: this locking mechanism might not work correctly if the
> data
-
Hash: SHA1
On 06/14/2010 02:56 AM, Prakash Reddy Bande wrote:
> Our application is a simple desktop application with a simple install and run
> setup. It is not possible to tell users to apply workaround of sharing the
> drive via SMB etc.
BTW SMB won't be much better than NFS
Hello,
I want to use sqlite as a db on a shared network drive (windows) (user would
map the network drive to say T:). I read the documentation section "File
Locking And Concurrency In SQLite Version 3"
(http://www.sqlite.org/lockingv3.html)
Where following is clearly mentioned:
"SQLite uses
Database
Subject: Re: [sqlite] File Locking And Concurrency In SQLite Version 3
On 12 Nov 2010, at 5:58pm, Prakash Reddy Bande wrote:
> My question: Is it possible to verify if the network drive on which the DB is
> place can be used?
Great question. Unfortunately LockFile() generall
Hi,
I have set a busy handler.
int ret = sqlite3_open(dbname.c_str(), _ppDb);
sqlite3_busy_handler(m_ppDb, , 0);
However it is not getting called. Here is what I am doing:
1. Using the sqlite3.exe run the following commands
begin transaction;
update users set name="hello"
2. Note I have not
r 12, 2010 4:57 PM
To: General Discussion of SQLite Database
Subject: Re: [sqlite] Busy handler not called
> int ret = sqlite3_exec(m_ppDb, query.c_str(), , ,
> );
>
> I get SQLITE_BUSY and hwLMsqlite3BusyHandler is not getting called.
What query do you use?
Pavel
On Fri, Nov 12, 2
-0500, Prakash Reddy Bande scratched on the
wall:
> Hi,
>
> I have set a busy handler.
>
> int ret = sqlite3_open(dbname.c_str(), _ppDb);
> sqlite3_busy_handler(m_ppDb, , 0);
>
> However it is not getting called.
As the docs for sqlite3_busy_handler() point
Hi,
I have a database placed on a shared drive.
Two processes (from different hosts) do a bunch of select commands.
I have a busy handler that sleeps of 1 second in each attempt and bails out
after 10 attempts.
The observation is that, if only one process is running (on any host) the
results
Hi,
I have observed that when multiple processes from "different" hosts are
concurrently doing the queries, the performance of sqlite degrades considerably.
Queries are read only hence I believe that there should not be any locking
issues (no busy handler called).
I will dig a little more in
23 matches
Mail list logo