Hey Simon,
thanks for your clarification.
> Will any of the processes accessing the database have write permission
> ? If not, if they're all just reading the existing database, then
> there's no opportunity for corruption. Think of it as
All of the processes (on "main" and remote host) have rea
On 10 Feb 2018, at 7:07am, Leonard Lausen wrote:
> thanks for your clarification.
You're welcome. A couple of things you wrote make me think I phrased things
poorly so I'm just taking this opportunity to illustrate what I wrote.
>> Will any of the processes accessing the database have write p
On 9 Feb 2018, at 10:50am, Leonard Lausen wrote:
> sqlite 3.22.0 added the ability to read from WAL mode databases even if
> the application lacks write permission on the database and its
> containing directory, as long as the -shm and -wal files exist in that
> directory.
>
> Even though the
On 2/9/18, Leonard Lausen wrote:
> sqlite 3.22.0 added the ability to read from WAL mode databases even if
> the application lacks write permission on the database and its
> containing directory, as long as the -shm and -wal files exist in that
> directory.
>
> Even though the wiki page states tha
sqlite 3.22.0 added the ability to read from WAL mode databases even if
the application lacks write permission on the database and its
containing directory, as long as the -shm and -wal files exist in that
directory.
Even though the wiki page states that WAL does not work over a network
filesystem
5 matches
Mail list logo
