Re: [sqlite] User function's alias
More strange things: SELECT x, sequence() AS y FROM t1 WHERE y>0 AND y<99 order by x desc; 9, 2 8, 3 7, 4 SELECT x, 0+sequence() AS y FROM t1 WHERE y>0 AND y<99 order by x desc; 9, 6 8, 6 7, 6 Seems that this optimization a little bit broken... -- Sent from: http://sqlite.1065341.n5.nabble.com/ ___ sqlite-users mailing list sqlite-users@mailinglists.sqlite.org http://mailinglists.sqlite.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users
Re: [sqlite] User function's alias
Well, behaviour of deterministic function is really strange. SELECT x, sequence() AS y FROM t1 WHERE y>0 AND y<99 AND y!=55 AND y NOT IN (56,57,58) AND y NOT LIKE 'abc%' AND y%10==2 order by x desc (Example from alias.test, I have declared sequence() with SQLITE_DETERMINISTIC flag) Trace for the query above: ... Function0 001 sequence(0) 00 r[1]=func(r[0]) Integer020 00 r[2]=0 Integer 9930 00 r[3]=99 Integer 5540 00 r[4]=55 String80 130 abc%00 r[13]='abc%' Function0 00 14 sequence(0) 00 r[14]=func(r[0]) Function0 3 138 like(2) 02 r[8]=func(r[13..14]) Function0 007 sequence(0) 00 r[7]=func(r[0]) ... sequence() is called 3 times in trace(even without branching), instead of using register r[1] after first call. -- Sent from: http://sqlite.1065341.n5.nabble.com/ ___ sqlite-users mailing list sqlite-users@mailinglists.sqlite.org http://mailinglists.sqlite.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users
Re: [sqlite] User function's alias
Jens Alfke-2 wrote > First off, you didn’t register the function as deterministic, so SQLite > has to assume it can return a different result every time it’s called, > even with the same arguments. That immediately prevents the kind of > optimization you wanted. I guess, it doesn't really matter whether function is deterministic or not. It is rather about how aliases should work. To prove it I have found "alias.test" in test folder. There is a comment: # Aliases are currently evaluated twice. We might try to change this # in the future. But not now. return The test is quite old, but still doesn't work. Moreover, consider query: SELECT x, rand() as random FROM tab WHERE random > 0.5; Currently, it would return random numbers which might be less than 0.5 due to two calls of rand(x). -- Sent from: http://sqlite.1065341.n5.nabble.com/ ___ sqlite-users mailing list sqlite-users@mailinglists.sqlite.org http://mailinglists.sqlite.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users
Re: [sqlite] User function's alias
> On Nov 10, 2017, at 9:51 AM, korablevwrote: > > I have noticed strange behaviour of user functions. Consider following > example: In reports like this, it really helps if you can clearly state the situation at the start, instead of dumping hundreds of lines of code and output, and expecting the reader to figure out what’s going on. Down at the end: > So, change_global_var is called 3 times for -- one for inserting and two for > comparison. I expected that it would call function one time, save result and > use saved result for comparisons and insertion. This is what should have been at the top :) First off, you didn’t register the function as deterministic, so SQLite has to assume it can return a different result every time it’s called, even with the same arguments. That immediately prevents the kind of optimization you wanted. As for deterministic functions, I asked a similar question a month or two ago, about factoring multiple calls out of a query. You can find list archives and read the thread. It doesn’t sound likely to happen. —Jens ___ sqlite-users mailing list sqlite-users@mailinglists.sqlite.org http://mailinglists.sqlite.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users