On Wed, Nov 5, 2014 at 6:24 PM, Andreas Kupries
wrote:
> How about looking into
>
> fossil test-shortest-path
>
> and see how it follows the path of revisions. ?
>
Oh, but were's the fun in rolling a wheel someone else already made round
;).
(moments later...)
It
How about looking into
fossil test-shortest-path
and see how it follows the path of revisions. ?
On Wed, Nov 5, 2014 at 9:04 AM, E. Timothy Uy wrote:
> Thank you, that is helpful information.
>
> On Tue, Nov 4, 2014 at 11:52 PM, Stephan Beal wrote:
Thank you, that is helpful information.
On Tue, Nov 4, 2014 at 11:52 PM, Stephan Beal wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 5, 2014 at 7:07 AM, E. Timothy Uy wrote:
>
> > The problem is ultimately not time-warps. DRH can confirm - the problem
> is
> > actually inside
On Wed, Nov 5, 2014 at 7:07 AM, E. Timothy Uy wrote:
> The problem is ultimately not time-warps. DRH can confirm - the problem is
> actually inside fossil and sqlite.fossil. Very early on in sqlite.fossil
> there are entries in the plink table where the parent id (pid) is greater
As I walked away to do the dishes, these verses from Matthew suddenly came
to mind:
The LORD said unto my Lord, Sit thou on my right hand, till I make thine
> enemies thy footstool? If David then call him Lord, how is he his son?
I think I'll just be quiet now.
Blessings,
Tim
On Tue, Nov 4,
I am not behind http://repo.or.cz/w/sqlite.git - though Kyle (the one
behind it) has some good ideas that would be nice to get into fossil. But
he doesn't care to try to get them into fossil. I do. Please don't
misinterpret the answers below as any kind of disrespect for DRH, SQLite or
fossil -
Maybe E. Timothy Uy is the person behind http://repo.or.cz/w/sqlite.git ?
On Tue, Nov 4, 2014 at 7:15 PM, Warren Young wrote:
> On Nov 3, 2014, at 7:01 PM, E. Timothy Uy wrote:
>
> > Is that a philosophical question? :)
>
> No, it’s a persuasion challenge.
>
On Nov 3, 2014, at 7:01 PM, E. Timothy Uy wrote:
> Is that a philosophical question? :)
No, it’s a persuasion challenge.
I’ll propose it in two parts:
1. Why is it a good idea for you, E. Timothy Uy, to dump the SQLite code repo
into a Git repo? What does this achieve, that
Is that a philosophical question? :)
On Mon, Nov 3, 2014 at 5:52 PM, Richard Hipp wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 3, 2014 at 8:46 PM, E. Timothy Uy wrote:
>
> > Ok, I now see that you intentionally left 2 time-warps in place. It would
> > be helpful to make that as a note
On Mon, Nov 3, 2014 at 8:46 PM, E. Timothy Uy wrote:
> Ok, I now see that you intentionally left 2 time-warps in place. It would
> be helpful to make that as a note for exporting to git.
>
Why would I want to export the SQLite history to Git?
--
D. Richard Hipp
d...@sqlite.org
Guess my photo got blocked -
https://www.sqlite.org/src/timeline?c=2010-09-28+20:26:44 shows the
time-warp but also the tag messages fixing them (which I guess you later
unfixed in the db).
On Mon, Nov 3, 2014 at 5:46 PM, E. Timothy Uy wrote:
> Ok, I now see that you
Ok, I now see that you intentionally left 2 time-warps in place. It would
be helpful to make that as a note for exporting to git. It is also
confusing that the tags are there showing that they were fixed.
On Mon, Nov 3, 2014 at 5:44 PM, E. Timothy Uy wrote:
> Dear Richard,
>
>
Dear Richard,
It is strange, but if you look at the timeline image I sent (second email),
your time-warp tag changes are clearly there but did not stick on objid
35450 and 35460. I just manually did mine on this end (following your same
times) and it is now ok, though I feel a bit dirty changing
On Mon, Nov 3, 2014 at 8:13 PM, E. Timothy Uy wrote:
> I found some posts in the past describing fixing time-warps using tags. How
> does this process get initiated? I found two while trying to export to .git
>
The test_timewarps webpage will show them all to you. Example:
14 matches
Mail list logo