Hi Henry.
Find "SELECT DB_NAME(i++)" mechanism implemented with the latest commit
(27fdccc) as a fallback in case that standard one fails.
Kind regards,
Miroslav Stampar
On Tue, Jul 3, 2012 at 2:01 AM, Henry Waves wrote:
> I've met dozens of practical cases when --dbs switch becomes useless
>
Hi Henry,
On 3 July 2012 01:01, Henry Waves wrote:
> I've met dozens of practical cases when --dbs switch becomes useless
> with --dbms=mssql (can't say precisely, but maybe <2008 versions). The
> only workaround proved itself useful is retrieval of db_name(i++) using
> --sql-shell while other st
I've met dozens of practical cases when --dbs switch becomes useless
with --dbms=mssql (can't say precisely, but maybe <2008 versions). The
only workaround proved itself useful is retrieval of db_name(i++) using
--sql-shell while other standart techniques were totally useless.
Another reason i
