i've changed mysql table to use NULL as default
afterwhile the insert works
thank you
*** REPLY SEPARATOR ***
On 15/09/2006 at 16:35 Oleg Broytmann wrote:
>On Fri, Sep 15, 2006 at 02:07:32PM +0200, Ivan Horvath wrote:
>> Invalid: expected a datetime in the DateTimeCol 'docDone'
On Fri, Sep 15, 2006 at 02:07:32PM +0200, Ivan Horvath wrote:
> Invalid: expected a datetime in the DateTimeCol 'docDone', got
> '-00-00 00:00:00' instead
Did MySQL return that instead of NULL?
Oleg.
--
Oleg Broytmannhttp://phd.pp.ru/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Best regards, Ivan
Horvath Chief Programmer Alcatel ISD PMS 2000 Product
Team H-1116, Budapest Kondorfa u. 10. Tel.: +36 1 209
9546 Fax.: +36 1
209 9599 Mobil: +36
30 257 0235 VOIP:
+49 511 676 478010 [EMAIL PROTECTED] Anyone who
has never made a mistake has never tried
Thanks Oleg, Dan and Markus!!!, and I could finaly understand the issue.
The code by Dan helps me.
On Fri, 15 Sep 2006 13:35:25 +0300
Dan Pascu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> If you want to see if you have memory leaks try to run your code in an
> infinite loop:
>
> while 1:
> obj_list = []
On Friday 15 September 2006 12:41, Hiroki Tamakoshi wrote:
> On Fri, 15 Sep 2006 11:30:11 +0200
> calling gc.collect() doesn't change the memory usage.
> (Dan's patch is applied)
>
> obj_list = []
> for i in xrange( 1000 ):
> obj = SomeObject( parameters ... )
> obj_list.append( obj ) #
On Friday 15 September 2006 12:41, Hiroki Tamakoshi wrote:
> On Fri, 15 Sep 2006 11:30:11 +0200
>
> "Markus Gritsch" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Because you cannot explicitely delete an object. By calling del on a
> > variable which holds a reference to it, you just remove this
> > particular r
On 9/15/06, Markus Gritsch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 9/15/06, Hiroki Tamakoshi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, 15 Sep 2006 11:30:11 +0200
> > "Markus Gritsch" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > Because you cannot explicitely delete an object. By calling del on a
> > > variable w
On 9/15/06, Hiroki Tamakoshi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Fri, 15 Sep 2006 11:30:11 +0200
> "Markus Gritsch" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Because you cannot explicitely delete an object. By calling del on a
> > variable which holds a reference to it, you just remove this
> > particular re
On Fri, 15 Sep 2006 11:30:11 +0200
"Markus Gritsch" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Because you cannot explicitely delete an object. By calling del on a
> variable which holds a reference to it, you just remove this
> particular reference to the object. If it was the last reference
> pointing to t
On 9/15/06, Hiroki Tamakoshi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, 15 Sep 2006 10:57:31 +0200
> "Markus Gritsch" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > del obj_list[:] in your example code is definitely not what you want.
> > By [:] you create a copy of your list, and the statement you wrote
> > deletes j
On Fri, 15 Sep 2006 10:57:31 +0200
"Markus Gritsch" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> del obj_list[:] in your example code is definitely not what you want.
> By [:] you create a copy of your list, and the statement you wrote
> deletes just this copy.
>
> In the following example obj_list is still ther
On 9/15/06, Hiroki Tamakoshi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Thanks Dan,
>
> Can I consult with you even if the problem I have is not the problem of
> circular references?
>
> The expected work is clear, and natural I think:
> 1. A sqlobject is persistent in RDBMS,
> 2. and when I want to delete the o
Thanks Dan,
Can I consult with you even if the problem I have is not the problem of
circular references?
The expected work is clear, and natural I think:
1. A sqlobject is persistent in RDBMS,
2. and when I want to delete the object, it is freed from memory(and
cache), but its data is still persi
13 matches
Mail list logo
