Re: [SQLObject] SQLObject.q.foreign_keyID vs. SQLObject.q.foreign_key_ID

2013-08-02 Thread Oleg Broytman
On Fri, Aug 02, 2013 at 11:43:59AM -0400, Rhubarb Sin wrote: > I changed all instances of _ID to ID in my code to test with SQLObject > 1.5.0b1dev-r4622 and found no problems. Thank you for the inspiration and the report! Oleg. -- Oleg Broytmanhttp://phdru.name/

Re: [SQLObject] SQLObject.q.foreign_keyID vs. SQLObject.q.foreign_key_ID

2013-08-02 Thread Rhubarb Sin
On 7/20/13, Oleg Broytman wrote: > On Thu, Jul 11, 2013 at 09:45:13AM -0400, Rhubarb Sin > wrote: >> On 7/10/13, Oleg Broytman wrote: >> >I tested this, it works, so I committed the change at the revision >> > 4613: >> > http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?thread_name=E1Uwysp-0003DP

Re: [SQLObject] SQLObject.q.foreign_keyID vs. SQLObject.q.foreign_key_ID

2013-07-20 Thread Oleg Broytman
On Thu, Jul 11, 2013 at 09:45:13AM -0400, Rhubarb Sin wrote: > On 7/10/13, Oleg Broytman wrote: > >I tested this, it works, so I committed the change at the revision 4613: > > http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?thread_name=E1Uwysp-0003DP-4G%40webwareforpython.org&forum_name=sqlobje

Re: [SQLObject] SQLObject.q.foreign_keyID vs. SQLObject.q.foreign_key_ID

2013-07-11 Thread Oleg Broytman
On Thu, Jul 11, 2013 at 09:45:13AM -0400, Rhubarb Sin wrote: > On 7/10/13, Oleg Broytman wrote: > >I tested this, it works, so I committed the change at the revision 4613: > > http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?thread_name=E1Uwysp-0003DP-4G%40webwareforpython.org&forum_name=sqlobje

Re: [SQLObject] SQLObject.q.foreign_keyID vs. SQLObject.q.foreign_key_ID

2013-07-11 Thread Rhubarb Sin
On 7/10/13, Oleg Broytman wrote: >I tested this, it works, so I committed the change at the revision 4613: > http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?thread_name=E1Uwysp-0003DP-4G%40webwareforpython.org&forum_name=sqlobject-cvs > >This is a major API change IMO so I'm cautious and only

Re: [SQLObject] SQLObject.q.foreign_keyID vs. SQLObject.q.foreign_key_ID

2013-07-10 Thread Oleg Broytman
Hi! On Sat, Jun 15, 2013 at 10:35:17PM +0400, Oleg Broytman wrote: > On Fri, Jun 14, 2013 at 04:57:10PM -0400, Rhubarb Sin > wrote: > > I was surprised when I recently discovered I had to add an extra > > underscore to use a SQLObject class's foreign key ID when using > > sqlobject.sqlbuilder.O

Re: [SQLObject] SQLObject.q.foreign_keyID vs. SQLObject.q.foreign_key_ID

2013-06-15 Thread Oleg Broytman
Hello! Sorry for late answer. I am very busy these days - with my family, job, construction of our dacha... On Fri, Jun 14, 2013 at 04:57:10PM -0400, Rhubarb Sin wrote: > I was surprised when I recently discovered I had to add an extra > underscore to use a SQLObject class's foreign key ID when

[SQLObject] SQLObject.q.foreign_keyID vs. SQLObject.q.foreign_key_ID

2013-06-14 Thread Rhubarb Sin
I was surprised when I recently discovered I had to add an extra underscore to use a SQLObject class's foreign key ID when using sqlobject.sqlbuilder.Outer. For example, this works: EXISTS(Select(Foo.q.id, where=Outer(Bar).q.foo_ID == Foo.q.id)) This does not work: EXISTS(Select(Foo.q.id, where=