Thanks for your help and clarification.
Implementing my own method if I need this sounds good enough for me.
Oleg Broytmann wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 09, 2008 at 05:11:38PM +, Richard Cooke wrote:
>
>> Can I insert this relationship the other way round at all? How could I
>> specify that rBird
On Tue, Dec 09, 2008 at 05:11:38PM +, Richard Cooke wrote:
> Can I insert this relationship the other way round at all? How could I
> specify that rBirds is a child of rPets instead of specifying that rPets
> is the parent of rBirds? I tried:
>
> rPets.addChildren(rBirds)
>
> But addChildre
Hmm, it seems I don't have a problem after all. I have just changed my
code to this again and it works. I was sure I'd already tried this
approach and got an error.
Can I insert this relationship the other way round at all? How could I
specify that rBirds is a child of rPets instead of specifyi
On Tue, Dec 09, 2008 at 03:30:58PM +, Richard Cooke wrote:
> rBirds = prodcats.new(name="birds", longname="Birds")
> rBirds.parent = rPets
It is possible if the default for the column is None. What problems do
you have?
Oleg.
--
Oleg Broytmannhttp://phd.pp.ru/
I saw this example: http://wiki.sqlobject.org/joinexample.html of an
object being joined to itself in a parent/child relationnship, but I
have not managed to find a way to set the parent object after the object
has been added.
E.g. instead of using this:
rBirds = prodcats.new(name="birds", lon
