On Sun, Sep 28, 2008 at 06:01:24PM -0400, David Turner wrote:
> I have written a patch for this. Since I noticed the change in the
> inheritance system, that's where the test for it ended up going. If
> this is OK with you, I'll commit it.
Ok from me. It passed the test suite in the trunk.
On Sun, 2008-09-28 at 00:51 +0400, Oleg Broytmann wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 27, 2008 at 01:51:45PM -0400, David Turner wrote:
> > Depending on how attributes are set on child classes, rowupdatesignal
> > fires either just on the base class, or on both the base and the child.
> > This is inconsistent.
>
On Sat, Sep 27, 2008 at 01:51:45PM -0400, David Turner wrote:
> Depending on how attributes are set on child classes, rowupdatesignal
> fires either just on the base class, or on both the base and the child.
> This is inconsistent.
I suspect a subtle bug in SLObject._SO_setValue().
Oleg.
--
