>
> I'm digging into this - but if there is another solution, like creating
> explicit table aliases to B and joining them with
I got it working locally, and it passes all _my_ tests. The key was to prevent
the childName-column to be overridden by the parents child-name column. So
now, things wo
On Tuesday 05 December 2006 23:05, Oleg Broytmann wrote:
> (Returning to the list...)
>
> On Tue, Dec 05, 2006 at 10:42:41PM +0100, Diez B. Roggisch wrote:
> > Lets consider this hierarchy:
> >
> > class A:
> >pass
> >
> > class B(A)
> >pass
> >
> > class C(B)
> >pass
> >
> > class D(B)
(Returning to the list...)
On Tue, Dec 05, 2006 at 10:42:41PM +0100, Diez B. Roggisch wrote:
> Lets consider this hierarchy:
>
> class A:
>pass
>
> class B(A)
>pass
>
> class C(B)
>pass
>
> class D(B)
>pass
>
> class E(A):
>pass
>
>
> Now I have a page that shows all A,
On Tue, Dec 05, 2006 at 06:41:39PM +0100, Diez B. Roggisch wrote:
> I have to paraphrase that: the real problem seems not to be that the support
> isn't there - it it that the childName columns value isn't distinguishing
> _all_ subclasses on the topmost class, as I was expecting. Consider this
On Tue, Dec 05, 2006 at 06:17:30PM +0100, Diez B. Roggisch wrote:
> I just found out that multiple inheritance doesn't work over more than one
> level.
A program is beign written in our company uses 3-4 levels of
inheritance, so I think you are wrong.
Oleg.
--
Oleg Broytmann
On Tuesday 05 December 2006 18:17, Diez B. Roggisch wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I just found out that multiple inheritance doesn't work over more than one
> level. Is this an oversight, and people are interested in having a solution
> for this, or is it by design?
I have to paraphrase that: the real problem
