On Sun, Feb 08, 2009 at 06:16:01PM -0500, Stef Telford wrote:
> seeing about 190 connects/disconnects on the postgreSQL side. Now,
> since a connection is costly (believe me, it is ;), how can I get
> these down to (in theory) 1. I know that may seem unrealistic, but
> still, there shouldn't be 190
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Oleg Broytmann wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 08, 2009 at 06:16:01PM -0500, Stef Telford wrote:
>> seeing about 190 connects/disconnects on the postgreSQL side.
>> Now, since a connection is costly (believe me, it is ;), how can
>> I get these down to (in theory
On Mon, Feb 09, 2009 at 12:35:47PM -0500, Stef Telford wrote:
> slaveConnection._pool = None
It must be exactly opposite:
slaveConnection._pool = []
Well, an empty list is the default value, so by default SQLObject should
not disconnect but use a low-level connection from the pool.
Oleg.
Oh, BTW, do you use transactions? And call transaction.commit()?
Oleg.
--
Oleg Broytmannhttp://phd.pp.ru/p...@phd.pp.ru
Programmers don't die, they just GOSUB without RETURN.
--
Cr
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Oleg Broytmann wrote:
> Oh, BTW, do you use transactions? And call transaction.commit()?
>
> Oleg.
Hello again Oleg,
Nope, well, I mean I -plan- to, but currently, the connection is
being made at the start of the page and then I go through get'ting
On Mon, Feb 09, 2009 at 01:03:53PM -0500, Stef Telford wrote:
> Oleg Broytmann wrote:
> > Oh, BTW, do you use transactions? And call transaction.commit()?
> >
> I don't see why/how wrapping everything in a transaction would
> change things.. but then.. that's jst me :)
Transaction object in
