Re: [SlimDevices: SqueezeCenter] Two LMS Installs, Different LMS Scan Results...

2021-10-14 Thread staresy
Thanks all, I found the problem, although I'm not sure what caused it. The Metadata for two tracks had become corrupted and displayed nothing even though the tracks themselves were present. I tracked down the offending tracks by using LMS documenter to analyse both DB, export the results and the

Re: [SlimDevices: SqueezeCenter] Two LMS Installs, Different LMS Scan Results...

2021-10-14 Thread d6jg
Stop LMS and copy library.db to somewhere. Use SQLIteBrowser to extract tracks table to CSV. Do on both installs and then compare the two side by side in Excel. Jim https://jukeradio.double6.net VB2.4[/B] STORAGE *QNAP TS419P (NFS) [B]Living Room* Joggler & Pi4/Khadas -> Onkyo TXNR686 -> Ce

Re: [SlimDevices: SqueezeCenter] Two LMS Installs, Different LMS Scan Results...

2021-10-14 Thread bpa
An alternative might to get a list of all albums and compare the list https://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?112602-How-to-list-all-Albums-and-Artists-in-LMS-library bpa's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/me

Re: [SlimDevices: SqueezeCenter] Two LMS Installs, Different LMS Scan Results...

2021-10-14 Thread Paul Webster
scanner.log (in same directory as the server.log) - but you might have to turn up the logging levels. Settings/Advanced/Logging/scan.scanner (I assume) You can get to the log from the web interface Settings/Information then scroll to the bottom. Paul Webster http://dabdig.blogspot.com author

[SlimDevices: SqueezeCenter] Two LMS Installs, Different LMS Scan Results...

2021-10-14 Thread staresy
Hi, I have two LMS 8.3 installs on WIn10 Servers, the Music directory is mirrored between the two. Usually, after adding music, re-scanning each server, the library statistics are identical on each server. However, after recently adding a few albums, mirrroring, re-scanning, one server now shows

Re: [SlimDevices: SqueezeCenter] Raspberry Pi & LMS - way to postpone start-up?

2021-10-14 Thread Man in a van
RobbH wrote: > Sorry! I did see that leaving the Pi powered down when not in use was > the current practice, but did not understand that continuing to do that > was necessarily a goal. That was my failure to think it through. > Obviously, if the solution were that simple, you would have already