LMS is using the "setpriority" system call on unixy system. I couldn't
find any special handling of the value whatsoever. I assume you're on Linux?
___
Squeezecenter mailing list
Squeezecenter@lists.slimdevices.com
Paul Webster wrote:
> I have never tried it ... but set it to 10 and -10 to see if it shows
> that the number is being used etc
It's been years since I was a frequent user of LMS so a little rusty
coming back, but I seem to recall it would actually run at the priority
set, which it doesn't
I have never tried it ... but set it to 10 and -10 to see if it shows
that the number is being used etc
Paul Webster
author of \"now playing\" plugins covering radio france (fip etc),
planetradio (bauer - kiss, absolute, scala, jazzfm etc), kcrw, abc
australia and cbc/radio-canada
and, via
LMS 8.3 comes with native support for Apple Silicon. Mostly native,
anyway [emoji6]. My main dev machine is a M1.
Michael
"It doesn't work - what shall I do?" - "Please check your server.log
and/or scanner.log file!"
(LMS: Settings/Information)
Are you running, or will you run, your Mac 24/7?
Is your media on local Mac-attached drives? or on a NAS?
I was running a Mac Mini i7 with LMS, but with my media on a NAS, I
migrated to running LMS on a headless Raspberry Pi (PiCorePlayer, of
course).
I find it's a much better solution. Uses
I can't find it anywhere doing a search, but am wondering if LMS is
happy on an M1 yet? I'm having issues with my 10-year old Mac MINI i7
and am considering the upgrade. Thanks...
Eric Seaberg - San Diego
-A.E.S., I.E.E.E., S.M.P.T.E., S.P.A.R.S.-
e...@seaberg.com
Scanner Priority is set to -20 and rescans initiated by LMS are with
--priority=-20, however looking at the scanner.pl process using HTOP
it's running at 20? Should scanner.pl's priority no be -20 when set
accordingly in LMS?
*'puddletag' (http://puddletag.sourceforge.net/)* - now packaged
w3wilkes wrote:
> Good idea on swapping PS with the other receiver. I've always done the
> reset on the controller from Advanced settings with no issue though. I
> will put your method in my "treasures of truth" if I need it in the
> future.
:)
I think both methods are the same, the '+'/power
