On 02/04/2017 12:31 PM, Amos Jeffries wrote:
> On 3/02/2017 4:05 a.m., Alex Rousskov wrote:
>> On 02/01/2017 11:51 PM, Amos Jeffries wrote:
>>
>>> Can we agree on this being a fundamental design in Squid:
>>>
>>> * all connections have an associated socket ID.
>>
>> That assumption would be too
On 3/02/2017 4:05 a.m., Alex Rousskov wrote:
> On 02/01/2017 11:51 PM, Amos Jeffries wrote:
>
>> Can we agree on this being a fundamental design in Squid:
>>
>> * all connections have an associated socket ID.
>
> That assumption would be too limiting (and, AFAICT, unnecessary). For
> example,
On 4/02/2017 8:27 a.m., Christos Tsantilas wrote:
> ... such as ERR_ACCESS_DENIED with HTTP/403 Forbidden triggered by an
> http_access deny rule match.
>
> The old code allowed ssl_bump step1 rules to be evaluated in the
> presence of an error. An ssl_bump splicing decision would then trigger
>
