Re: [squid-dev] More woes with ubuntu-precise

2015-08-18 Thread Amos Jeffries
On 15/08/2015 3:05 a.m., Alex Rousskov wrote: On 08/13/2015 10:52 PM, Amos Jeffries wrote: On 14/08/2015 10:18 a.m., Alex Rousskov wrote: On 08/13/2015 09:29 AM, Kinkie wrote: EnumIterator has brought out one more issue with ubuntu-precise: since it carries gcc-4.6, it doesn't support

Re: [squid-dev] More woes with ubuntu-precise

2015-08-18 Thread Alex Rousskov
On 08/18/2015 02:11 AM, Amos Jeffries wrote: The admin need that keeps being put forward is stability. With the meaning of non-changing.. As in; nobody touches the Squid code from now until 2020 or so. Personally, I have not heard anything like that from any admin. The requirements I have

Re: [squid-dev] More woes with ubuntu-precise

2015-08-14 Thread Alex Rousskov
On 08/13/2015 10:52 PM, Amos Jeffries wrote: On 14/08/2015 10:18 a.m., Alex Rousskov wrote: On 08/13/2015 09:29 AM, Kinkie wrote: EnumIterator has brought out one more issue with ubuntu-precise: since it carries gcc-4.6, it doesn't support std::underlying_typeenum. The options are: -

Re: [squid-dev] More woes with ubuntu-precise

2015-08-13 Thread Amos Jeffries
On 14/08/2015 10:18 a.m., Alex Rousskov wrote: On 08/13/2015 09:29 AM, Kinkie wrote: EnumIterator has brought out one more issue with ubuntu-precise: since it carries gcc-4.6, it doesn't support std::underlying_typeenum. The options are: - drop support for precise in trunk. We claim