Re: [squid-dev] [RFC][PATCH] Bug4438 second attempt: give MemBlob its own pools

2016-03-19 Thread Alex Rousskov
On 03/16/2016 02:04 AM, Kinkie wrote: > On Tue, Mar 15, 2016 at 9:43 PM, Alex Rousskov wrote: >> On 03/14/2016 02:11 PM, Kinkie wrote: >>> this second attempt at bug4438 tries a different approach: by giving >>> MemBlob its own pools and having a hard initialization dependency in >>> MemBlob's

Re: [squid-dev] [RFC][PATCH] Bug4438 second attempt: give MemBlob its own pools

2016-03-16 Thread Kinkie
On Tue, Mar 15, 2016 at 9:43 PM, Alex Rousskov wrote: > On 03/14/2016 02:11 PM, Kinkie wrote: > >> this second attempt at bug4438 tries a different approach: by giving >> MemBlob its own pools and having a hard initialization dependency in >> MemBlob's

Re: [squid-dev] [RFC][PATCH] Bug4438 second attempt: give MemBlob its own pools

2016-03-15 Thread Alex Rousskov
On 03/14/2016 02:11 PM, Kinkie wrote: > this second attempt at bug4438 tries a different approach: by giving > MemBlob its own pools and having a hard initialization dependency in > MemBlob's allocating function, instead of relying on memAllocString. Forgive me if I missed how this decision