Re: [squid-dev] [RFC] Disable Github issue tracker

Then it's also +1 for me to close for now but promote the README.md which will redirect users to the bugzilla.. Eliezer Eliezer Croitoru Linux System Administrator Mobile: +972-5-28704261 Email: elie...@ngtech.co.il -Original Message- From: squid-dev

Re: [squid-dev] What should we do about these *wrong* wiki articles?

As I understood the article the DNAT is from another box ie "the router" to the squid box. If I understood it wrong and didn't read properly I will re-read them and see in what I am wrong. Squid doesn't like to act as intercept proxy and to have the destination ip and port as itself ie: Client

Re: [squid-dev] [PATCH] Purge cache entries in SMP-aware caches

On 07/13/2017 07:26 AM, Eduard Bagdasaryan wrote: > Hello, > > I am attaching an improved version of the patch posted before. > It is based on v4 r15081. What was fixed: I do not see any high-level problems with this code, and it does not look like others are going to comment on the v4 patch

Re: [squid-dev] What should we do about these *wrong* wiki articles?

On 23/07/17 09:22, Eliezer Croitoru wrote: As I understood the article the DNAT is from another box ie "the router" to the squid box. If I understood it wrong and didn't read properly I will re-read them and see in what I am wrong. see the Details section notes. You are right about the

Re: [squid-dev] [RFC] Disable Github issue tracker

I also agree to close Issues for the time being. We can always reopen them later on if it'll be deemed useful. On Fri, Jul 21, 2017 at 5:37 PM, Alex Rousskov wrote: > On 07/21/2017 10:15 AM, Amos Jeffries wrote: >> Alex would you like to draw up a formal