On 5/8/20 5:11 PM, Francesco Chemolli wrote: > I rebuild our docker > images once a month to ensure they're fresh with what's in the wild.
FWIW, I think montly update frequency is excessive when there is no adequate update validation. I speculate that we are spending more time on faulty build tests than on fixing true build bugs the tests expose. > To decide how much effort to invest, how prevalent is this situation? On > Linux I'd expect this to be pretty much a corner case by now, is it not? Unfortunately, we do not know. Folks running SslBump on older OS releases may want to build with newer OpenSSL releases. Is that 1% of Squid deployments? 10%? 20% of those deployments that matter? Unknown. If it takes more than a few hours to change an existing (or add a new) test node that uses custom library locations for --with-foo=PATH options, then I would not do it (for now). You have bigger fish to catch. Alex. _______________________________________________ squid-dev mailing list squid-dev@lists.squid-cache.org http://lists.squid-cache.org/listinfo/squid-dev
