RE: new patch & new ideas (squid+epoll)

2003-11-12 Thread Gonzalo A. Arana
> ... > > This was fixed in the patch which went into HEAD wasn't it? True, I've checked squid-3.0-PRE3-20031112 (today snapshot). Btw, sory about coding style. I'll follow squid coding style on future patches. Regards Gonzalo

RE: new patch & new ideas (squid+epoll)

2003-11-12 Thread Henrik Nordstrom
On Wed, 12 Nov 2003, Gonzalo A. Arana wrote: > 4) then, squid calls again commSetSelect(fd, COMM_SELECT_READ, > read_handler, ...). This is because a new request may be received from > client through same TCP connection Yes. This is part of persistent connection management and also done as part

RE: new patch & new ideas (squid+epoll)

2003-11-12 Thread Gonzalo A. Arana
Hi, ouch, I realize my email was not clear. Sorry about that. Let me explain it with a verbose example: 1) New passive connection is established (via accept(2), client side connection). 2) squid calls commSetSelect(fd, COMM_SELECT_READ, read_handler, ...). This means that squid is interested on

Re: ntlm status

2003-11-12 Thread Serassio Guido
Hi, At 23.58 11/11/2003, Kinkie wrote: Robert Collins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Wed, 2003-11-12 at 08:58, Henrik Nordstrom wrote: >> Hi there, >> >> some months ago Robert indicated there was ongoing work for improving the >> ntlm support in Squid. But then there has been very silent abou