On Wed, 18 Feb 2004, Xia Hongtao wrote:
Dear Henrik Nordstrom:
I had get the final result of comparing three version.In my new test
environment, the response time:
orig 14.227ms no_pipe 13.550ms pipe_patch 13.905ms
What test did you run?
And have you verified the results are
Robert, what is the purpose of the auth_user_hash_pointer in the ntlm
scheme, and do you have any idea as to why the use of this would be
growing a lot?
Regards
Henrik
Hello All,
To use the refresh_pattern in fractions,I have attatched a patch as
refresh_fraction.patch
The calculation changes are needed in the cache_cf.c for the float.
I have tested for the refresh time as
refresh_pattern . 0 20%
); /* convert minutes to seconds */
+max = (time_t) GetTimeAsSeconds(); /* token: max */
+
/* Options */
while ((token = strtok(NULL, w_space)) != NULL) {
#if HTTP_VIOLATIONS
--- squid-3.0-PRE3-20040218/src/refresh.cc 2003-08-10 14:00:44.0 +0300
+++ squid-3.0-PRE3-20040218