On Tue, 2005-11-01 at 18:37 +0100, Serassio Guido wrote:
> Hi Andrews,
>
> At 03.18 28/10/2005, Andrew Bartlett wrote:
>
> >This was a regression. I've fixed this now.
>
> Some news:
>
> I can confirm to you that the SPN problem is fixed, the Samba 4
> machine was joined fine to the domain, a
On Tue, 1 Nov 2005 15:05:51 +0100 (CET)
Henrik Nordstrom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Summary of the opinions regarding a Squid-2.6 release
brr...
I can't understand, is it in "release" state now, or "just
defrosted" ?
SY,
Evgeny Kotsuba
On Tue, 1 Nov 2005, Serassio Guido wrote:
A simple question:
What should be the default order of authentication schema in cf.data.pre ?
negotiate, ntlm, digest, basic
Now is ntlm, negotiate, digest and basic.
Right.. negotiate needs to be moved up above ntlm.
But I think that It should b
Hi all,
I have a question about clientHttpRequest structure.
It has the field "clientHttpRequest *next".
Where the hell used this field?
I am showing code like that:
while (*H) {
if (*H == http)
break;
H = &(*H)->next;
}
But I can not find where two or more cl
Hi Henrik,
Some new about the status of Negotiate support:
I have fixed the crash problem in the Windows helper that you have
seen in my office, and now the Negotiate NTLM fallback works fine.
It's very easy to force Negotiate in NTLM mode: just try to
authenticate against a proxy without SPNs
Hi Andrews,
At 03.18 28/10/2005, Andrew Bartlett wrote:
This was a regression. I've fixed this now.
Some news:
I can confirm to you that the SPN problem is fixed, the Samba 4
machine was joined fine to the domain, and now I am able to see the
list of the shares from a Windows 2000 machine
Hi Robert,
At 16.27 01/11/2005, Robert Collins wrote:
Put me in here. I think getting 3.0 stable is not so hard, but will
never happen if the focus remains on 2.5/2.6 - 2.6 should only have
security fixes from 3.0.
Probably the release of Squid 2.6 will further delay the release of
Squid 3.0
On Tue, 2005-11-01 at 15:05 +0100, Henrik Nordstrom wrote:
> Summary of the opinions regarding a Squid-2.6 release
>
>
> Full in favor, including performance enhancements:
>
>* Henrik Nordstrom
>* Guido Serassio
>* Adrian Chadd
>+ Francesco 'Kinkie' Chemolli
>+ Reuben Farrell
On Tue, Nov 01, 2005, Henrik Nordstrom wrote:
> On Mon, 31 Oct 2005, Adrian Chadd wrote:
>
> >I'd like to get opinions on the patch before I work on making delay
> >pools stuff work with this and I'd like opinions (especially Henrik)
> >on whether this could go into squid-2.6.
>
> If you ask me t
On Mon, 31 Oct 2005, Adrian Chadd wrote:
I'd like to get opinions on the patch before I work on making delay
pools stuff work with this and I'd like opinions (especially Henrik)
on whether this could go into squid-2.6.
If you ask me then yes provided it does make a benefit and can be
reasonab
Summary of the opinions regarding a Squid-2.6 release
Full in favor, including performance enhancements:
* Henrik Nordstrom
* Guido Serassio
* Adrian Chadd
+ Francesco 'Kinkie' Chemolli
+ Reuben Farrelly
In favor, but no clear indication
+ Andrey Shorin
+ Paul Armstrong
Maybe,
Hi Henrik,
At 02.24 01/11/2005, Henrik Nordstrom wrote:
If there will be no oppositions, I like to start to work on it immediately.
Also update the wiki page please..
http://squidwiki.kinkie.it/Squid-2.6
Done.
And I will updated this page with the completion of every single step.
Regards
Hi,
At 18.48 31/10/2005, Paul Armstrong wrote:
Can you also please add the resolv.conf patches from Thien Vu (and
possibly the other patches I added to it when I ported it to 3.0) to the
feature list for 2.6?
But this is the bug #1326 :-)
Regards
Guido
-
13 matches
Mail list logo
