On Mon, 7 Nov 2005, Adrian Chadd wrote:
I agree with Henrik here. We need something that works, and works now.
A lot of the proposed 2.6 changes should go into squid-3 rather easily,
including my IO stuff.
Everything except your IO stuff is in squid-3 already to a large extent.
(the SSL code
On Mon, 7 Nov 2005, Adrian Chadd wrote:
is there an irc channel to join and chat amongst y'all?
#squiddev on freenode.
Usually a good idea to announce ahead if you want some serious discussion
however...
Regards
Henrik
On Mon, 2005-11-07 at 18:05 +0800, Adrian Chadd wrote:
is there an irc channel to join and chat amongst y'all?
I hang out in #squid-dev
Rob
--
GPG key available at: http://www.robertcollins.net/keys.txt.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
On Mon, 2005-11-07 at 08:23 -0500, Robert Collins wrote:
On Mon, 2005-11-07 at 18:05 +0800, Adrian Chadd wrote:
is there an irc channel to join and chat amongst y'all?
I hang out in #squid-dev
Bah, I mean #squiddev, of course.
Rob
--
GPG key available at:
On Mon, 2005-11-07 at 00:35 +0100, Henrik Nordstrom wrote:
If Squid-3.0.STABLE is realistic within a not too distant future then
Squid-2.6 is not needed and would in fact hurt Squid in the long run, no
matter how temting the release it may be to myself and others.
If Squid-3.0.STABLE is
