I have been giving the branch a lot of thought and a little testing
recently.
I have come to the conclusion that the IPv6 branch under squid3 as it
stands is in need of quite a makeover. I'd like your ideas on this:
Creating an IPAddress class to replace all the nasty macros
currently
mån 2007-02-12 klockan 13:14 +0530 skrev Siddhesh PaiRaikar:
On 2/12/07, Siddhesh PaiRaikar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
hi..
Can someone please tell me .. that when squid passes on the URL to another
program such as say squidguard...
does it write to stdin or somewhere else... and also
I've just modified Duane's html generating scripts (which are in
~adrian/pages-db
for now) to spit out stuff into the new website directory.
http://new.squid-cache.org/ now has working support, related software/writings
and
logfile script pages.
Adrian
mån 2007-02-12 klockan 20:46 +0800 skrev Adrian Chadd:
I'm about to start implementing replacement memory-only store client
primitives and I'm not fully on top of how the vary code abuses
store objects to do its thing in store.c.
He, abuses is a good description.
It actually doesn't do very
mån 2007-02-12 klockan 21:34 +1300 skrev Amos Jeffries:
Creating an IPAddress class to replace all the nasty macros
currently used in the (incomplete) preperation of HEAD for the future
ipv6 branch merge.
Yes, what I proposed when the branch was created..
I am not certain at this
On Mon, Feb 12, 2007, Henrik Nordstrom wrote:
Would you mind if the Vary support was culled out of the storage work
branch until I've tidied up the storage manager layer somewhat?
No problem. It's not really that tricky thing to support. The tricky
part was getting it into Squid-2 without
On Mon, 2007-02-12 at 08:38 +0100, Axel Westerhold wrote:
Well, the syntax you are proposing is somewhat limited.
Here are my comments:
1.) cn=%u assumes that the used username equals the assigned CN which is
most of the time wrong. Normally the UID (or in AD the samaccountname) is
used
Hi Alex,
Am 13.02.2007 6:03 Uhr schrieb Alex Rousskov unter
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Mon, 2007-02-12 at 08:38 +0100, Axel Westerhold wrote:
Well, the syntax you are proposing is somewhat limited.
Here are my comments:
1.) cn=%u assumes that the used username equals the assigned CN
