On Tue, Feb 27, 2007, Tsantilas Christos wrote:
Hi all,
I was looking in squid3 code last days. I read again Adrian's mails
in which he complained about squid3 speed, and cpu usage.
Looking in the code there are a number of code-pieces which can
improved. An example is the call of
Hi Henrik,
At 02.28 27/02/2007, Henrik Nordstrom wrote:
Squid-2.6.STABLE10 is now in the pipeline. Current CVS (or next nightly,
20070228 or later) is a release candidate in terms of code, save for
release notes etc..
Running the nt branch on Windows (currently last updated at 17
February),
Tsantilas Christos [EMAIL PROTECTED] 02/27/07 6:27
AM
Hi Adrian,
Adrian Chadd wrote:
agree .
Yes, I'd like to do all of what you've suggested above but I'm going
to do it by
junking most of the client-side request/reply handling routines and
replacing them
with stuff written from
On Tue, Feb 27, 2007, Tsantilas Christos wrote:
Ok Adrian, I am watching the mailing list and I know what you want to
do. I believe too that some parts of squid needs redesign, if the
project wants to survive. Squid is an old and huge project. And you
must continue your work because you
On Tue, Feb 27, 2007, Jeremy Hall wrote:
Let me second this. When you start asking questions about squid3 and
its stability, you get anything from it's stable to not for prime
time and when you ask questions about using it in a production
environment, most shy away from that.
* noone's
Adrian Chadd [EMAIL PROTECTED] 02/27/07 9:25 AM
On Tue, Feb 27, 2007, Jeremy Hall wrote:
Let me second this. When you start asking questions about squid3
and
its stability, you get anything from it's stable to not for prime
time and when you ask questions about using it in a production
On Tue, Feb 27, 2007, Jeremy Hall wrote:
I think we are on the same page for end-term goals, but what would you
recommend I do for today? Squid-3 is still a moving target.
So are you saying those of us that need icap need to just wait?
There's two parts.
One: Alex is working on improvements
Adrian Chadd [EMAIL PROTECTED] 02/27/07 10:00 AM
On Tue, Feb 27, 2007, Jeremy Hall wrote:
I think we are on the same page for end-term goals, but what would
you
recommend I do for today? Squid-3 is still a moving target.
So are you saying those of us that need icap need to just wait?
tis 2007-02-27 klockan 21:40 +0100 skrev Guido Serassio:
2007/02/27 21:28:47| helperStatefulHandleRead: 1 bytes from
negotiateauthenticator #1.
2007/02/27 21:28:47| helperStatefulHandleRead: 41 bytes from
negotiateauthenticator #1.
2007/02/27 21:28:47| helperStatefulHandleRead: 41 bytes
tis 2007-02-27 klockan 21:55 +0100 skrev Henrik Nordstrom:
Hmm.. this strikes me a bit odd.. Squid receiving data from the helper
before it sends the response..
Are you sure the helper responds correctly?
But regardless of this I can confirm that Negotiate seems to be broken..
Regards
On Tue, 2007-02-27 at 13:27 +0200, Tsantilas Christos wrote:
In the other hand I need a proxy with an icap client because I spent
time (and continue spending) to an icap related project. Squid3 has a
good icap client. The first problem someones can see in squid3 is that
there are some
On Tue, 2007-02-27 at 22:25 +0800, Adrian Chadd wrote:
On Tue, Feb 27, 2007, Jeremy Hall wrote:
Let me second this. When you start asking questions about squid3 and
its stability, you get anything from it's stable to not for prime
time and when you ask questions about using it in a
On Tue, 2007-02-27 at 23:00 +0800, Adrian Chadd wrote:
On Tue, Feb 27, 2007, Jeremy Hall wrote:
So are you saying those of us that need icap need to just wait?
There's two parts.
One: Alex is working on improvements to the ICAP code in Squid-3 which
I hope will act as a kind of reference
tis 2007-02-27 klockan 23:15 +0100 skrev Henrik Nordstrom:
Looking. Ah, it's due to Negotiate returning a final response to the
client, and this confuses the twisted logics here even further..
cleaning up to untwist the FINISHED/DONE states into one.
Ok. Should work better now. Please give it
Perhaps the storework branch will become a reference implementation to
speedup Squid3 when the time comes :-). I would prefer that folks spent
more energy on Squid 3.0 to make it stable faster (and only then
optimize Squid 3.1), but I am not going to call every project that is
not helping me
On Tue, Feb 27, 2007, Alex Rousskov wrote:
On Tue, 2007-02-27 at 22:25 +0800, Adrian Chadd wrote:
On Tue, Feb 27, 2007, Jeremy Hall wrote:
Let me second this. When you start asking questions about squid3 and
its stability, you get anything from it's stable to not for prime
time and
On Sat, 2007-02-24 at 08:43 +0100, Henrik Nordstrom wrote:
These locks gets cleared automatically after a while and the lock is now
gone.
Thanks for the explanation and snipped details. Unfortunately, it looks
like the problem is back and has even become worse as I see more locks
(from other
On Tue, Feb 27, 2007, Alex Rousskov wrote:
On Sat, 2007-02-24 at 08:43 +0100, Henrik Nordstrom wrote:
These locks gets cleared automatically after a while and the lock is now
gone.
Thanks for the explanation and snipped details. Unfortunately, it looks
like the problem is back and has
On Tue, Feb 27, 2007, Alex Rousskov wrote:
On Sat, 2007-02-24 at 08:43 +0100, Henrik Nordstrom wrote:
These locks gets cleared automatically after a while and the lock is
now
gone.
Thanks for the explanation and snipped details. Unfortunately, it looks
like the problem is back and has
On Tue, 2007-02-20 at 12:22 +0200, Tsantilas Christos wrote:
So yes I believe it is the same bug, but I thing the problem begins
because the state.writing is not updated correctly ...
Right, but the state is not updated correctly because of the bug you
have fixed.
I have committed your
20 matches
Mail list logo
