On Wed, 2007-03-21 at 18:04 +0100, Stefan Bischof wrote:
I am sure we will eventually see compromised or otherwise unfriendly
ICAP servers that do nasty things. Such servers would love to do
nasty
things on behalf of a client, using client identity if possible.
Thus,
I have a problem
On Thu, 2007-03-22 at 16:26 +0100, Kinkie wrote:
In this regard I see the ICAP server not to be any different from a
proxy server, of which it is simply an extension.
Whether the trust boundary includes both the proxy and the ICAP server
depends on the setup. Being an extension is not always
Alex Rousskov wrote:
On Thu, 2007-03-22 at 16:26 +0100, Kinkie wrote:
In this regard I see the ICAP server not to be any different from a
proxy server, of which it is simply an extension.
Whether the trust boundary includes both the proxy and the ICAP server
depends on the setup. Being an
