> Hi,
>
> At 13:47 02/03/2008, Robert Collins wrote:
>>Henrik and I have been fine tuning the bzr configuration instructions
>>and checking everything is sufficiently good to migrate across to.
>>
>>We propose to cut across on Tuesday; if there are no objections, then at
>>1200 UTC Tuesday, squid3
Hi Amos:
> Thank you for this Lucas. That will prove to be a very useful ACL.
Sure. Cheapper than url_regex ;)
> It may have to wait for Henrik to return after his current meeting and
> check it for squid-2.
>
> Meanwhile, any chance of getting a squid-3 port of this as well?
Hmm we
silly test of bzr send, ignore.
# Bazaar merge directive format 2 (Bazaar 0.90)
# revision_id: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
# 3ujtv9ey18c1yiiw
# target_branch: file:///data/bzr/squid3/trunk/
# testament_sha1: 7178857878c79f284b96e3357c4509f1cc2e2e39
# timestamp: 2008-03-02 19:47:01 +0100
# base_revision_id:
Hi Amos,
At 13:04 27/02/2008, Amos Jeffries wrote:
* Build and tests on as many OS as possible. (branch: SQUID_3_0)
I am running the tests I use on Debian/Ubuntu already. Could the rest
of you please jump in for any OS you have tests for or even just
compiling on.
I was able to build
On Sun, Mar 2, 2008 at 1:47 PM, Robert Collins
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[...]
> We propose to cut across on Tuesday; if there are no objections,
[...]
OK by me.
--
/kinkie
Henrik and I have been fine tuning the bzr configuration instructions
and checking everything is sufficiently good to migrate across to.
We propose to cut across on Tuesday; if there are no objections, then at
1200 UTC Tuesday, squid3 CVS will be frozen, and the import recreated.
The import takes
Lucas Brasilino wrote:
Hi
Some time ago Henrik asked for volunteer to some beginner squid developer task.
Due some time constraint problems (working on my final project), I
couldn't work on
it as I desired. But now I have more time (I hope :) ).
Well, here comes a initial patch against squid-2
