WCCP config cleanups mk2
- clean of the additional extras slipped in last time.
- corrected according to Adrians updated info
Amos
# Bazaar merge directive format 2 (Bazaar 0.90)
# revision_id: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
# target_branch: file:///src/squid/bzr/trunk/
# testament_sha1:
On Wed, 2008-09-10 at 23:42 -0600, Alex Rousskov wrote:
If the code is committed, I will go through affected bug reports (that I
know of) and update or close them.
Done. If I missed any affected bugs, please point me to them.
Finally, I am aware of one unreported(?) problem related to the
Was the header_access directive/functionality removed or otherwise
broken in Squid3/HEAD?
I am using squid-3.HEAD-20080910 with the following config lines:
acl appsds_ctl url_regex -i ^http://apps.ds.atv/
request_header_access Cache-Control deny appsds_ctl
header_access Cache-Control deny
On Fri, 2008-09-12 at 12:44 -0500, Ritter, Nicholas wrote:
Was the header_access directive/functionality removed or otherwise
broken in Squid3/HEAD?
I am using squid-3.HEAD-20080910 with the following config lines:
acl appsds_ctl url_regex -i ^http://apps.ds.atv/
request_header_access
the *_header_access directives can only change the external view of the
headers sent by Squid, not how Squid parses received headers.
To override bad things sent by client or server you need to use
refresh_pattern overrides. In your case both the ignore-reload and
ignore-private overrides.
Be
On tor, 2008-09-11 at 23:07 -0600, Alex Rousskov wrote:
It looks like I mistook the Reply-To: email header for a To: header. I
was not really sending those commit messages to squid-dev, just to
squid-cvs. So I was not really spamming. Until now...
No problem.
Got me a little confused there
On tor, 2008-09-11 at 09:54 -0600, Alex Rousskov wrote:
You mean as a large blob of comments at the end of some .h file? The
cons are:
I think Adrian is thinking more of blobs next to the implementations
(.cc)
As time has passed a little I have this slightly refined view:
* Overview type
On tor, 2008-09-11 at 10:03 -0600, Alex Rousskov wrote:
You made the right choice. The modifying methods modify their object
approach is more efficient and should be expected by most C++
developers.
Yes, the other approach (return a new object) is used mainly for
operators.
C = A + B;
On fre, 2008-09-12 at 20:39 +1200, Amos Jeffries wrote:
+#define WCCP2_FORWARDING_METHOD_GRE WCCP2_METHOD_GRE
+#define WCCP2_FORWARDING_METHOD_L2 WCCP2_METHOD_L2
+#define WCCP2_PACKET_RETURN_METHOD_GRE WCCP2_METHOD_GRE
+#define WCCP2_PACKET_RETURN_METHOD_L2WCCP2_METHOD_L2
On Fri, 2008-09-12 at 22:28 +0200, Henrik Nordstrom wrote:
On tor, 2008-09-11 at 09:54 -0600, Alex Rousskov wrote:
You mean as a large blob of comments at the end of some .h file? The
cons are:
I think Adrian is thinking more of blobs next to the implementations
(.cc)
As time has
The specification defines them as separate entities and using them in
this fashion makes it clearer for people working on the code.
Adrian
2008/9/13 Henrik Nordstrom [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On fre, 2008-09-12 at 20:39 +1200, Amos Jeffries wrote:
+#define WCCP2_FORWARDING_METHOD_GRE
With the patch the code uses WCCP2_METHOD_.. in some places (config
parsing/dumping) and the context specific ones in other places. This is
even more confusing.
Very minor detail in any case.
On lör, 2008-09-13 at 09:49 +0800, Adrian Chadd wrote:
The specification defines them as separate
Henrik Nordstrom wrote:
On tor, 2008-09-11 at 23:07 -0600, Alex Rousskov wrote:
It looks like I mistook the Reply-To: email header for a To: header. I
was not really sending those commit messages to squid-dev, just to
squid-cvs. So I was not really spamming. Until now...
No problem.
Got me
Amos, why are you pushing through changes to the WCCP configuration
stuff at this point in the game?
The WCCPv2 stuff works fine (for what it does); it could do with some
better documentation but what it really needs is to be broken out from
Squid itself and run as a seperate daemon.
Adrian
I've committed a slightly modified version of this - store_rebuild.c
r1.80 . Take a look and see if it works for you.
Thanks!
Adrian
2008/8/5 Alexander V. Lukyanov [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hello!
I use squid in transparent mode, so I don't want degraded performance
while rebuilding and cleanup.
Hiya,
Could you please verify this is still a problem in the latest 2.HEAD
and if so lodge a bugzilla bug report with the patch?
Thanks!
Adrian
2008/8/5 Alexander V. Lukyanov [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hello!
Some time ago I had core dumps just after these messages:
Short response from
have you dumped this into bugzilla?
Thanks!
2008/9/3 Alexander V. Lukyanov [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hello!
I have noticed lots of 'impossible keep-alive' messages in the log.
It appears that httpReplyBodySize incorrectly returns -1 for 304 Not
Modified replies. Patch to fix it is attached.
--
17 matches
Mail list logo
